Investigative Journalist and former LAPD officer Mike Ruppert explains the significance of the Chris Dorner story in the framework of the power of the US Police State. Richard Gage and Peter Drew discuss an upcoming Court case in the UK that could signal breakthrough for the 9/11 Truth movement. Former Georgia Congress Woman and Presidential candidate Cynthia McKMinney talks about her background in the context of Big Money corruption and control of the US political framework, Part one of two.
Download
See also:
http://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2012/09/reality-check-waco-pearl-harbor-and-911.html
Related:
(from cryptogon.com)
Britain: Man Refuses to Pay for TV License Because BBC Covered Up Facts About 9/11
February 26th, 2013
Via: Daily Mail:
A 49-year-old man refused to pay his TV licence because he believed the BBC covered up facts about the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Tony Rooke, who represented himself today at Horsham Magistrates’ Court in West Sussex, said he did not want to give money to an organisation ‘funding the practice of terrorism’.
Rooke, who admitted owning a TV and watching it without a licence, was found guilty of using an unlicensed set, given a six-month conditional discharge and told to pay £200 costs.
He was visited in May 2012 by an inspector after withdrawing his licence in March, but said he was withholding the funds under the Terrorism Act.
Section 15 of the 2000 Act states that it is an offence for someone to invite another to provide money, intending that it should be used, or having reasonable cause to suspect that it may be used, for terrorism purposes.
‘I am withholding all funds from the BBC, the Government and subsidiaries under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act,’ he told the inspector.
He added that he had already lodged a complaint with the BBC.
Rooke told the court: ‘I believe the BBC, who are directly funded by the licence fee, are furthering the purposes of terrorism and I have incontrovertible evidence to this effect. I do not use this word lightly given where I am.’
He was not allowed to show his pre-prepared video evidence in court because the District Judge said it was not relevant to the trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.