Please help keep InfoWars on the air! https://www.infowars.com/?cp=1
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
PERMISSION TO BREATHE FREELY, SIR? (Amazing Polly)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2MQ6znL4TeAw/
I agree with Amazing Polly on this one 100%, we wouldn't be in this mess if people had a back-bone and resisted. They would have to drop their mandates that have exactly nothing to do with public health and everything to do with overhanded top-down control, psychological conditioning, and depopulation + transhumanism, if people simply resisted. Take the military vaccine mandate, where they mandated shots for the original SARS-COV-2 Alpha strain when Alpha was no longer in circulation, Delta was, but this is assuming they actually afford something other than a .8% Absolute Risk Reduction which only represents reduction in severity of symptoms and even this metric was derived with dubious means and new data shows they actually destroy the immune systems (ADE, VAIDS, cancer) and afford negative immunity, if everyone in service refused, they would have to drop the mandate, as they could not replace everyone all at once.
STOP COMPLYING.
We win this when you figure this out. Hence the draconian, Orwellian censorship.
She is absolutely a voice worth listening to right now, she has amazing, I would say unrivalled investigative skills, check out her past work:
The censorship would not be necessary if the situation was hopeless.
Monday, April 25, 2022
Power Grid Kill Switch Discovered (InfoWars)
Sunday, April 24, 2022
Mike Adams And Owen Shroyer Discuss How To Survive In A Potential Societal Collapse (InfoWars)
In support of what I stated the day after WEF Young Global Leader Putin invaded Ukraine:
https://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2022/02/order-out-of-chaos-how-ukraine-conflict.html
Oh and as I pointed out in that blog post, now they are getting everyone ready for food shortages and famine. Also, 30% of the world's grain export comes from Russia. So it's not just more expensive gas at the pump. Also, if you have an understanding of modern agriculture, you understand that oil is implicated in the entire process, from petro-chemical fertilizer, the fueling of the large scale monocrop combines, tractors, the trucks that convey the food from farm to a food processing plant where they are packaged in packaging itself derived from oil (plastic, styrofoam etc.) etc. etc. etc. They intend to depopulate, did you think they would only use deadly cancer and VAIDS inducing endothelial destroying death shots?
Oh and as I pointed out in that blog post, now they are getting everyone ready for food shortages and famine. Also, 30% of the world's grain export comes from Russia. So it's not just more expensive gas at the pump. Also, if you have an understanding of modern agriculture, you understand that oil is implicated in the entire process, from petro-chemical fertilizer, the fueling of the large scale monocrop combines, tractors, the trucks that convey the food from farm to a food processing plant where they are packaged in packaging itself derived from oil (plastic, styrofoam etc.) etc. etc. etc. They intend to depopulate, did you think they would only use deadly cancer and VAIDS inducing endothelial destroying death shots?
Friday, April 22, 2022
Alex Jones David Icke and Other Special Guests Destroy the New World Order
Thomas Renz is awesome in this one. Please help keep InfoWars on the air!
Thursday, April 21, 2022
The Collapse of Netflix Signals the END of the NWO Thought Police’s Stranglehold on Humanity 4/20/22 (Alex Jones, InfoWars)
When viewing this, assuming youre not watching the live broadcast, please bear in mind that when this is posted to banned.video in archive format the commercial breaks AND stellar audio interludes demarcating them from the main show are removed and that's why AJ sounds like he's singing to himself coming back from commercial breaks.
Please help keep InfoWars on the air! https://www.infowars.com/?cp=1
VAXXED PILOT GOES INTO CARDIAC ARREST IN COCKPIT: FREEDOM FLYERS EXPOSE MASSIVE AIRLINE COVER-UP (Stew Peters)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EvEW4TjzJcfm/
The pilot himself attributes the condition and situation to the "vaccine" @ 3 min mark: https://www.bitchute.com/embed/GMfv2HZbsZBQ/
Full:
IMF Slashes Global Economic Outlook, Confirms Depression – Mass Starvation IMMINENT - 4/19/22 (InfoWars)
The first half up to and including Dr. Lee Merrit is must watch, the latter half is optional. Please support InfoWars!
Human Microchip Implants and the “Internet of Bodies” (Mercola)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/human-microchip-implants-internet-bodies/5778010
By Dr. Joseph Mercola, Global Research, April 19, 2022
Implantable microchips are marketed as the ultimate in convenience, but the goal is to create the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior”
Sweden is one of the earliest adopters of implantable microchips. The chip is implanted just beneath the skin on the hand, and operates using either near-field communication (NFC) — the same technology used in smartphones — or radio-frequency identification (RFID), which is used in contactless credit cards
Implanted payment chips are an extension of the internet of things; they’re a way of connecting and exchanging data, and the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks
Countries around the world are now working on a system for a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a fiat currency in digital form that is programmable so that you can only spend your money on certain things or in specific places, as desired by the issuer
In the end, everything will be connected to a single implantable device that will hold your digital identity, health data and programmable CBDCs. Your digital identity, in turn, will include everything that can be known about you through surveillance via implanted biosensors, your computer, smartphone, GPS, social media, online searches, purchases and spending habits. Algorithms will then decide what you can and cannot do based on who you are
The goal is to create what’s known as the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior.”1
Key words in that sentence that the PR machine skips right over is the stated goal to “modify human bodies and behavior.” And who will be in charge of those modifications? They don’t say, but we can safely assume that it will be those who have something to gain from the modification of your actions and behaviors.
Sweden Paves the Way for Microchipping
As noted in the featured NBC News segment, Sweden is one of the earliest adopters of implantable microchips. The chip, about the size of a grain of rice, is implanted just beneath the skin on the hand, and operates using either near-field communication (NFC) — the same technology used in smartphones — or radio-frequency identification (RFID), which is used in contactless credit cards.
Already, Sweden has become more or less a cashless society. Now, this tiny implant will replace the need for debit and credit cards all together, as well as identification and keys. To pay for an item, all you have to do is place your left hand near the contactless card reader, and the payment is registered.
An estimated 5,000 to 10,000 Swedes have been chipped so far, although Swedish authorities claim they don’t know the exact number, as there’s no central registry.
At present, it’s claimed that the chips cannot be tracked, but that doesn’t mean they’ll remain untrackable in the future. And, while these early microchips contain only limited amounts of information, we know the WEF dreams of implementing a global digital identification system that would include everything imaginable about you, from your online search history and medical information to your personal banking data, social credit score and more.
Humans Are Becoming Hackable
As noted by financial technology expert Theodora Lau, implanted payment chips are “an extension of the internet of things;” they’re a way of connecting and exchanging data, and the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks.2
This is particularly true if and when more personal information begins to be migrated into them, leaving you vulnerable to hackers and surveillance. She told BBC News:3
“How much are we willing to pay, for the sake of convenience? Where do we draw the line when it comes to privacy and security? Who will be protecting the critical infrastructure, and the humans that are part of it?”
A PBS NewsHour segment from 20194 also reviews some of the concerns surrounding implantable microchips (see video above). Importantly, just about any smartphone can read the chip with the proper scanner installed, and “anybody would be able to hack it,” according to Dr. Geoff Watson, a consultant anesthetist5 who has teamed up with the chip’s inventor “to ensure the implant procedure is carried out to a medical standard.”
While many say they have no privacy fears around the current microchips, it’s reasonable to suspect that privacy concerns will rise in tandem with the amount of personal information held on the chips, and with the number of people who have the implants.
Credit card theft was rare in the beginning and typically involved physical loss of the card. Today, you can’t seem to keep a credit card for more than a handful of years before it’s somehow stolen even though the card is still in your possession.
Identity theft is also rampant, and getting worse by the day, as millions of illegals in need of new identities flood across the southern border of the United States.
As noted by the Center for Immigration Studies, illegal immigrants are not “undocumented,” as most will obtain fraudulent documents through identity theft.6 In other words, they’re stealing the legal identities of Americans. In 2020, the total cost for identity theft and identity fraud was $56 billion — the highest in recorded history — and affected 39 million Americans.7
There’s no reason to believe theft and fraud won’t happen as microchipping becomes more commonplace. And that risk is in addition to the risks involved with government spying on and controlling both your behavior and spending once the microchips are connected to your personal finances and programmable digital currencies.
In a November 2019 interview with CNN,8 history professor and adviser to WEF founder Klaus Schwab, Yuval Noah Harari, warned that “humans are now hackable animals,” meaning, the technology exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself, and that can be very dangerous if misused.
He predicted that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job, whether you’ll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow and even who you will marry.
The Plan to Control the ‘Useless Masses’
1/ Klaus Schwab’s top advisor says advancements in technology will render people useless and worthless. ➡️They’ll need drugs and computer games to cope. https://t.co/dq6HfqQ0Be
https://t.co/dq6HfqQ0Be
— Gigi Sims (@GigiSims10) April 11, 2022
In another interview, Harari discussed what Schwab refers to as The Fourth Industrial Revolution (read: transhumanism), noting that we’re now learning to “produce bodies and minds” (meaning augmented bodies, and cloud and artificial intelligence-connected minds) and that one of the greatest challenges we face will be what to do with all the people that have become obsolete in the process.
How will unaugmented people find meaning in life when they’re basically “useless, meaningless”? How will they spend their time when there’s no work, no opportunity to move up in some kind of profession? His guess is that the answer will be “a combination of drugs and computer games.” I’ll let you decide if that’s a vision of utopia or hell on earth.
Nothing Will Be Private — Not Even Your Bodily Functions
The WEF’s plan for the IoB even includes biosensors that measure and monitor your biological functioning and emotional states. Already, the U.S. Pentagon and Profusa Inc. have collaborated on the development of a tiny implantable biosensor that detects disease by tracking chemical reactions inside your body.9
For example, it would be able to determine whether you’ve been infected with a virus like SARS-CoV-2 or influenza long before any symptoms emerge. As explained by Defense One, the biosensor consists of two parts:10
“One is a 3mm string of hydrogel, a material whose network of polymer chains is used in some contact lenses and other implants. Inserted under the skin with a syringe, the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection.
The other part is an electronic component attached to the skin. It sends light through the skin, detects the fluorescent signal and generates another signal that the wearer can send to a doctor, website, etc. It’s like a blood lab on the skin that can pick up the body’s response to illness before the presence of other symptoms, like coughing.”
Now, the sensor allows a person’s biology to be examined at a distance via smartphone connectivity, and Profusa is backed by Google, the largest data mining company in the world.
Knowing that, it’s hard to imagine that your biological data won’t be used to boost Google’s profits and increase government control. While Profusa was expecting to receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2021, it doesn’t appear to have been approved yet.
Other Monitoring and Tracking Devices in the Pipeline
Another invention that stands poised to track your health is biocompatible near-infrared quantum dot microneedle arrays. As explained in a 2019 Science Translational Medicine article,11 this novel vaccine delivery system is able to “deliver patterns of near-infrared light-emitting microparticles to the skin” that can then be “imaged using modified smartphones.” In short, it would serve as an invisible tattoo of your vaccination record.
Bill Gates has also funded the development of a birth control microchip that can be turned on and off by remote control. The National Post writes:12
“The birth control microchip … would hold nearly two decades worth of a hormone commonly used in contraceptives and dispense 30 micrograms a day … The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation has given more than $4.5 million to MicroCHIPS, Inc., to ‘develop personal system that enables women to regulate their fertility’ …”
In November 2019, Daré Bioscience, a San Diego-based biopharma company, announced13 it had reached an agreement to acquire MicroCHIPS Biotech and would be adding the birth control microchip to its portfolio. Interestingly, back in 2014, MicroCHIPS appeared confident it would be able to get the product to market in 2018, but as of 2022, it’s still in development.
Programmable Digital Currencies Are Next
In the video above, WhatsHerFace comments on Canada’s 2021 announcement of its plan for a CBDC that will be universally accessible, even if you don’t have a bank account or a cell phone. What kind of device might fulfill that? An implanted microchip, of course, that has your digital identity and digital wallet on it.If you’re protesting against what they’re doing, they’ll turn off your chip and you have nothing … It’s total control of the people. ~ Aaron Russo, 2007
In 2007, American business man and film producer Aaron Russo told “Infowars” that the goal of the New World Order was to create “a one world government, where everybody has an RFID chip implanted in them, and all money is to be in those chips.”
“There will be no more cash, and this [information] was given to me straight from Rockefeller himself,” Russo said. “So, they can take out any money they want, any time they want. They say, ‘You owe us this much in taxes,’ and they just take it out of your chip. Total control. And … if you’re protesting against what they’re doing, they’ll turn off your chip and you have nothing … It’s total control of the people.”
Fast-forward to April 2022, and Canada is now permanently enshrining its government-imposed sanctions against protesters in its new budget.14 As you may recall, the Canadian government shut down the bank accounts of participants in the trucker protest against vaccine mandates, and even those who donated as little as $25 to the protest.
Crowdfunding platforms will now be more tightly regulated, and the government is also launching a legislative review of cryptocurrencies. Just imagine the control the Canadian government would have had with a programmable CBDC. They could have prevented the donations from occurring at all, and shut down the account of anyone who even tried to give a few dollars to the freedom movement.
A Carefully Crafted Plan for World Domination?
All of this is happening at the same time that the World Health Organization, another deep state technocrat stronghold, is building a global vaccine passport system.15 Once CBDCs and a global vaccine passport system are up and running, it won’t be long before they’re combined into one — likely in the form of an implantable microchip.
We can predict this because they’ve told us that this is the plan. Just look through the WEF’s website descriptions of The Great Reset16 and Fourth Industrial Revolution.17
Read the Rockefeller Foundation’s April 2020 white paper,18 “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities,” which spells out the direction of social control through the implementation of permanent COVID-19 tracking and tracing measures.
Look into the ID2020 Alliance,19 a public-private partnership founded by Bill Gates’ GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance, The Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, Accenture and Ideo.org.20 Members in the alliance include the Learning Economy Foundation,21 founded by the United Nations in 2018,22Facebook, Mastercard, ShareRing, Simprints and others.23
ID2020 began as a digital identity program for Bangladesh, and has since expanded to include “the implementation of digital technologies which tie with the [Learning Economy] Foundation’s vision of a world in which learners can map their educational progress to achieve their academic, employment, and life goals.”24
In the end, everything will be connected to a single implantable device. Right now, it’s a tossup as to whether a vaccine passport or a digital identity platform will be the foundation for what’s to come, but what is certain is that whatever it’s called, it will include your digital identity, vaccination status and other health data, and programmable CBDCs.
Your digital identity, in turn, will include everything else that can be known about you through surveillance via implanted biosensors, your computer, smartphone, GPS, social media, online searches, purchases and spending habits. Imagine having an AI listening, watching and scoring every move you make and every heartbeat, and algorithms deciding what you can and cannot do based on your behavior, expression, social contacts and personal views.
Add to that technologies that can modify your behavior and emotional state with or without your knowledge, which is what the WEF’s 2020 briefing document on the IoB describes.25 It may sound like science fiction, but this is what they intend to do. Every new technology, every new surveillance opportunity they bring forward is to further this aim.
For decades, we’ve embraced technologies with our mind set on convenience and/or safety. That’s always how they rope us in. But we will lose everything worth living for if we continue down this path without foolproof privacy safeguards and personal autonomy rights in place.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Notes
1, 25 WEF, Shaping the Future of the Internet of Bodies, July 2020
2, 3 BBC April 11, 2022
4 PBS January 30, 2019
5 New York Post August 3, 2017
6 Center for Immigration Studies June 19, 2009
7 Privacy Bee How Much Does Identity Theft Cost?
8 CNN November 26, 2019
9, 10 Defense One March 3, 2020
11 Science Translational Medicine December 18, 2019; 11(523)
12 National Post January 24, 2015
13 Xconomy.com November 15, 2019
14 Reclaim the Net April 9, 2022
15 The Counter Signal April 11, 2022
16 WEF Great Reset
17 WEF Fourth Industrial Revolution
18 The Rockefeller Foundation, National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities, April 21, 2020 (PDF)
19 Biometric Update September 20, 2019
20 ID2020 Founding Partners
21, 22 Gavi.org, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
23 ID2020 General Partners
24 Biometric Update August 5, 2021
The original source of this article is Mercola
Related:
Tuesday, April 19, 2022
Hi-tech Hell on Earth | Episode 12 (Liberty Man, Framing The World, InfoWars)
https://banned.video/watch?id=625b75e362b7070afa20e224
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hyXFB9VLFoZU/
How do you feel about becoming a “product” in the New World Order clown scheme? That’s literally what the parasitic-elite psychopaths have in mind for you. They want to jack you up with nanotech, connect you to their “smart” grid, own your DNA, call your physical body their “intellectual property,” and prescribe your future (if you’re allowed to have one). It’s almost unbelievable. For that reason, Liberty Man takes us on another tour into the ubiquitous and covert technology deployment that is unfolding worldwide. This time we discuss nanotech’s mutagenetic potential, mRNA changing your genetics through reverse transcriptase, along with intellectual property protections for the downstream complimentary DNA (cDNA). Paul Wittenberger is riding shotgun to show us a bunch of admissions from pop culture, government think tanks, and control freaks like Bill Gates that confirm they are indeed planning to enslave humanity while setting themselves up as gods (so they think).
I'm a huge proponent of Liberty Man's idea that the "elites" fictionalize reality by concurrently weaving real life events into movie based media narratives, which has the effect of delegitimizing discussion of the topic in question, because now it's assumed that the topic derived from a fictional narrative. The "elites" have been busy shaping perception through Hollywood movies for decades. See: Operation Mockingbird. Liberty Man does a great job by following up the recent fictionalizing of "a plot to enslave humanity with nanotechnology on the inside of the body" (7 min mark) in the most recent James Bond movie with a scene from Casino Royale (23 min mark) where "M" tells Bond "When they analyzed the stock market after 9/11, when the stocks hit bottom on 9/12 someone made a fortune"; this actually happened, there were massive put calls on both United and American Airlines on 9/10/2001 and now this aspect of the total 100% inside job of 9/11 is rendered fictionalized and if you mention to it someone casually in passing it's met with "yeah sure thing pal, you've been watching too many movies".
Related:
Monday, April 18, 2022
MIT's Dean of Science responds to me: She's NOT interested in looking at the vax safety data! (Steve Kirsch)
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/mits-dean-of-science-responds-to?s=r
She has intellectual curiosity in all areas of science... except the vaccines. She believes they are safe and effective and she's NOT interested in looking at ANY data challenging her beliefs.
Steve Kirsch
Apr 15
Steve Kirsch (left), MIT Dean of Science Nergis Mavalvala (right) taken April 15, 2022 at MIT breakfast in Palo Alto
Summary
The Dean of Science at MIT believes open discussion to resolve differences of scientific opinion should be encouraged. That’s the good news.
However, when I asked her whether she would publicly call for such a discussion for the vaccines, her answer was “No.” That’s the bad news.
I also asked her if I could show her data that would change her mind. Her answer was, “No.”
This is an important issue; it is an issue that affects the health of every MIT student, staff, and faculty member. She knows that there are two legitimate sides of this issue because she knows that at least one MIT faculty member agrees with me that the COVID vaccines are dangerous. Yet open discussion on this is forbidden at MIT. They simply are not interested in hearing from anyone with any credentials (such as my colleagues) who is able to challenge their policies.
Dean Mavalvala should be actively facilitating the resolution of this important issue by calling for an open discussion. Instead, she is stonewalling and hoping it will go away. She’s wrong. It won’t.
My meeting with Dean Mavalvala
I was able to speak personally to the Dean of Science at MIT today thanks to an MIT breakfast scheduled 10 minutes from my home.
As you can see from the photo above, she’s fully bought into the mainstream narrative that masks work even though the science says they don’t work at all (and it isn’t even a close call). So I didn’t think my conversation would go that well. I was right.
I started off asking her why nobody at MIT would sponsor my talk. She said that the faculty sponsor must be both familiar with and supportive of the body of work.
OK, so that’s actually a reasonable response. No objection from me.
She also knew that Professor Retsef Levi had agreed to sponsor my talk on the MIT campus. But it wasn’t MIT who located Professor Levi. I was the one who found Professor Levi. He subscribes to my Substack and saw my frustration and reached out to me.
Professor Levi is a hero… one of the few (perhaps only) MIT faculty members who independently looked at the data and came to the same (obvious) conclusion that the vaccines were bad news. All of his attempts to persuade other MIT faculty members to look at the underlying data were unsuccessful. So now I don’t feel so bad. It’s not just me. People just don’t like to be shown they are wrong…especially on something that is life threatening.
I asked Dean how I could convince her that the MIT policies on the vaccine and masking were wrong. She replied that science advances through peer-reviewed research.
I said sure, but that process has been corrupted. She agreed with that but said that’s the way it is.
She was not interested in looking at any data that would challenge her beliefs that the vaccines are safe and effective
Next, I asked if I could meet with her to share the data showing the vaccines are unsafe. She said she was not interested in that because that isn’t her field.
That’s interesting because right after our conversation, she gave a talk about how she is fascinated by all areas of science and loves her job as Dean since she gets to learn about all the cool stuff going on at MIT.
Yet she is not interested in seeing data that challenges her beliefs that affect everyone at MIT, and that has likely caused injury and perhaps death of MIT students, staff, and faculty members. So her intellectual curiosity basically stops at the point that I challenge her strongly held beliefs.
I said that it is really important that there should be an OPEN discussion between the different points of view on the vaccine. She agreed.
She then gave her talk.
After the talk, I asked her if she would “walk the talk.” Specifically, would she publicly call out the “experts” who refuse to be challenged to have an open discussion with those who have differing views?
Her answer was “no” she wouldn’t call for this because she thinks the vaccines are safe.
I pressed her on this. I believe that her role as Dean of Science at MIT includes championing science in public policy. When public policy is based on bad science, all our science leaders should be speaking out about that. At that very instant, she and her handlers insisted that “she had to leave” before she could answer my question.
So I then sent her the following email offering to finish the conversation.
Dean Mavalvala,
I'm sorry you were rushed at the end and we didn't have time to continue our conversation.
This is important to resolve as we believe that over 100,000 Americans have been killed by the vaccine and we have 10 different ways to show that. If we are right, the vaccines should be immediately stopped and not mandated at MIT.
I would like to finish our conversation on a zoom call. It would take less than 5 minutes.
I think you have a responsibility to call for the right thing which is an open discussion between the two sides. You agreed this was the right thing to do before your speech.
This isn't going to be resolved by "peer reviewed science" since that process has been corrupted (which you acknowledged). Also, resolution of differences through publication of peer reviewed studies is a laborious, time consuming process that has been corrupted.
It's important to have the disagreements over the vaccine resolved ASAP as a huge number of Americans refuse to be vaccinated. Are they justified? It's a matter of great public concern.
Open discussions are a faster, more efficient way to resolve such differences. This is especially important when we are in a state of emergency.
For example, in less than 2 hours, we were able to resolve all of our issues with the Bangladesh mask study due to the interactive nature of the discussion. In just 2 hours, it became clear to any objective viewer that the study failed to show masks worked. This would have taken years to resolve via peer review since there would be conflicting papers.
In addition, science is supposed to encourage resolution of differences through discussion and debate rather than censorship.
I note that the scientists who disagree with the mainstream narrative WANT an open discussion/debate on the key issues.
Yet those who claim the vaccines are safe and effective WANT censorship and REFUSE to be held accountable.
For example, this happened in Canada where 3 top Canadian scientists asked for a discussion with Canada's health authorities. The authorities did not show up at the table. They sent no one. How do we resolve our differences when the other side is afraid to show up at the table?
As Dean of Science at MIT you should be speaking out publicly against the censorship of scientists because you should be a defender of Science. Similarly, I believe you should call for those who promote the mainstream narrative on vaccine safety to accept challenges from legitimate qualified scientists. You could say this is not your role, but the fact is that no other prominent person is stepping up to the plate to do this. As a defender of science, it is your responsibility to step in and make things right, don't you think? If not, who will?
-steve
I will let you know if I hear back. Don’t hold your breath.
If you know anyone at MIT, be sure to share this article with them.
Summary
The Dean of Science at MIT believes open discussion to resolve differences of scientific opinion should be encouraged. That’s the good news.
However, when I asked her whether she would publicly call for such a discussion for the vaccines, her answer was “No.” That’s the bad news.
I also asked her if I could show her data that would change her mind. Her answer was, “No.”
This is an important issue; it is an issue that affects the health of every MIT student, staff, and faculty member. She knows that there are two legitimate sides of this issue because she knows that at least one MIT faculty member agrees with me that the COVID vaccines are dangerous. Yet open discussion on this is forbidden at MIT. They simply are not interested in hearing from anyone with any credentials (such as my colleagues) who is able to challenge their policies.
Dean Mavalvala should be actively facilitating the resolution of this important issue by calling for an open discussion. Instead, she is stonewalling and hoping it will go away. She’s wrong. It won’t.
My meeting with Dean Mavalvala
I was able to speak personally to the Dean of Science at MIT today thanks to an MIT breakfast scheduled 10 minutes from my home.
As you can see from the photo above, she’s fully bought into the mainstream narrative that masks work even though the science says they don’t work at all (and it isn’t even a close call). So I didn’t think my conversation would go that well. I was right.
I started off asking her why nobody at MIT would sponsor my talk. She said that the faculty sponsor must be both familiar with and supportive of the body of work.
OK, so that’s actually a reasonable response. No objection from me.
She also knew that Professor Retsef Levi had agreed to sponsor my talk on the MIT campus. But it wasn’t MIT who located Professor Levi. I was the one who found Professor Levi. He subscribes to my Substack and saw my frustration and reached out to me.
Professor Levi is a hero… one of the few (perhaps only) MIT faculty members who independently looked at the data and came to the same (obvious) conclusion that the vaccines were bad news. All of his attempts to persuade other MIT faculty members to look at the underlying data were unsuccessful. So now I don’t feel so bad. It’s not just me. People just don’t like to be shown they are wrong…especially on something that is life threatening.
I asked Dean how I could convince her that the MIT policies on the vaccine and masking were wrong. She replied that science advances through peer-reviewed research.
I said sure, but that process has been corrupted. She agreed with that but said that’s the way it is.
She was not interested in looking at any data that would challenge her beliefs that the vaccines are safe and effective
Next, I asked if I could meet with her to share the data showing the vaccines are unsafe. She said she was not interested in that because that isn’t her field.
That’s interesting because right after our conversation, she gave a talk about how she is fascinated by all areas of science and loves her job as Dean since she gets to learn about all the cool stuff going on at MIT.
Yet she is not interested in seeing data that challenges her beliefs that affect everyone at MIT, and that has likely caused injury and perhaps death of MIT students, staff, and faculty members. So her intellectual curiosity basically stops at the point that I challenge her strongly held beliefs.
I said that it is really important that there should be an OPEN discussion between the different points of view on the vaccine. She agreed.
She then gave her talk.
After the talk, I asked her if she would “walk the talk.” Specifically, would she publicly call out the “experts” who refuse to be challenged to have an open discussion with those who have differing views?
Her answer was “no” she wouldn’t call for this because she thinks the vaccines are safe.
I pressed her on this. I believe that her role as Dean of Science at MIT includes championing science in public policy. When public policy is based on bad science, all our science leaders should be speaking out about that. At that very instant, she and her handlers insisted that “she had to leave” before she could answer my question.
So I then sent her the following email offering to finish the conversation.
Dean Mavalvala,
I'm sorry you were rushed at the end and we didn't have time to continue our conversation.
This is important to resolve as we believe that over 100,000 Americans have been killed by the vaccine and we have 10 different ways to show that. If we are right, the vaccines should be immediately stopped and not mandated at MIT.
I would like to finish our conversation on a zoom call. It would take less than 5 minutes.
I think you have a responsibility to call for the right thing which is an open discussion between the two sides. You agreed this was the right thing to do before your speech.
This isn't going to be resolved by "peer reviewed science" since that process has been corrupted (which you acknowledged). Also, resolution of differences through publication of peer reviewed studies is a laborious, time consuming process that has been corrupted.
It's important to have the disagreements over the vaccine resolved ASAP as a huge number of Americans refuse to be vaccinated. Are they justified? It's a matter of great public concern.
Open discussions are a faster, more efficient way to resolve such differences. This is especially important when we are in a state of emergency.
For example, in less than 2 hours, we were able to resolve all of our issues with the Bangladesh mask study due to the interactive nature of the discussion. In just 2 hours, it became clear to any objective viewer that the study failed to show masks worked. This would have taken years to resolve via peer review since there would be conflicting papers.
In addition, science is supposed to encourage resolution of differences through discussion and debate rather than censorship.
I note that the scientists who disagree with the mainstream narrative WANT an open discussion/debate on the key issues.
Yet those who claim the vaccines are safe and effective WANT censorship and REFUSE to be held accountable.
For example, this happened in Canada where 3 top Canadian scientists asked for a discussion with Canada's health authorities. The authorities did not show up at the table. They sent no one. How do we resolve our differences when the other side is afraid to show up at the table?
As Dean of Science at MIT you should be speaking out publicly against the censorship of scientists because you should be a defender of Science. Similarly, I believe you should call for those who promote the mainstream narrative on vaccine safety to accept challenges from legitimate qualified scientists. You could say this is not your role, but the fact is that no other prominent person is stepping up to the plate to do this. As a defender of science, it is your responsibility to step in and make things right, don't you think? If not, who will?
-steve
I will let you know if I hear back. Don’t hold your breath.
If you know anyone at MIT, be sure to share this article with them.
....
Related:
https://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2022/04/censored-doctors-and-researchers.html
Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Bryan Ardis, Attorney Thomas Renz and Researcher Steve Kirsch speak before the Pennsylvania house and senate to cover the horribly corrupt and murderous COVID-19 national response. There is a ten minute highlight at the start if this video. This video was pulled off of youtube.
LET THE GAMES BEGIN (Max Igan, Crowhouse)
Thursday, April 14, 2022
Controlled Burn: Learn How the Fed Used the Covid Lockdown to Wreck the Economy (Edward Dowd, InfoWars)
https://banned.video/watch?id=62589fcec58d7a01a2b444d9
This is the same analogy I used over a year ago to describe the situation with regards to the potential collapse of the global economy and how the "elite" behind the Fake Pandemic had to start it prematurely to get in front of and control it and because their vaccine salesman, Gates, had been implicated in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking of minors (he rode Lolita Express 26 times over the course of 21 years and Melinda has divorced him over this revelation, do the math):
https://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2021/05/epsteins-conviction-bill-gates.html
Controlled Burn is the analogy I used to describe the situation to a family member over the phone way back in 2020 and she insisted that this was simply conspiracy theory and that pharma owned mainstream media was more trustworthy. At one point she even blocked my text messages and she and others don't respond to email. I went completely out of my way to warn them and anyone who would listen. I've had longtime friends on social media whom I served with in the Army unfriend me and cut off all communication over this. They all think I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist. This is how bad the Mass Formation Psychosis is.
From a social media post of mine from Nov of last year:
https://www.facebook.com/hp.pervinkler/posts/451283469719145
Bill Clinton with an underage girl named Rachel Chandler on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet "Lolita Express"
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/r0oymh/bill_clinton_with_an_underage_girl_named_rachel/
Bill Gates also took Lolita Express 26 times over the past 21 years (and now Melinda is leaving him as she is coping with these revelations) per Epstein's flight logs. Epstein was "suicided" in June of 2019. Bill Gates is the spokesperson for the response to the "Pandemic". Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and the Rockefellers held a tabletop exercise on the 18th of Oct 2019 called Event 201 simulating, of all things to simulate, a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus. Attendees include all institutions and actors in positions to implement policy when the first cases are reported two months later. The global economy was also on the verge of collapse. In Forestry management the practice of burning young saplings and underbrush is called Controlled Burn, the concept is to control an inevitable fire. The economy was going to collapse anyways, the analogy here is to direct / control the collapse.
They have had this plan ready to go since at least 2010:
My blog post on this from May of this year, although I postulated this connection well over a year ago, it's just in the intervening time we had the emergence of supporting information such as the Rockefeller Foundation planning guidance paper "Lock Step" scenario which outlined precisely the scenario we currently find ourselves in.
The most chilling aspect of the Rockefeller Foundation's Lock Step Scenario is that they predict that it takes the public 9 years to become weary and exhausted with the pandemic narrative.
They had this "pandemic" planned for a while now, Epstein's conviction and inevitable implicating of the Davos Great Reset Gang's public outward spokesperson for the Final Final Solution, Bill Gates, and the freefall collapse of the economy already well underway (primary driver, U.S. Debt, raising of the debt ceiling, money printing, and the inevitable weakening and of the petro-dollar and ultimately it's replacement, had the Davos Great Reset Gang not pulled the plug on it all with the "Pandemic") forced them to accelerate their agenda timeline:
Related:
Prelude to my recent Vlog Post
17:45 min mark.
https://youtu.be/RQ9GfzMLcD4?t=1065
Revisiting this PC upgrade video from December of last year I realize that I lay out more factual data about the "pandemic" in a more coherent way than I did in my recent vlog + nature walk. Also, as an update, thanks to Omicron between 70-80% of the U.S. has been exposed to "COVID" and therefore has Natural Immunity and has no need for Gene Therapy Technology "vaccines" that afford negative protection (yes, negative protection, they destroy your immune system, see my blog).
Oh look, Russia has invaded Ukraine, just in time! Look over there, look over there! Don't look at the death wave afflicting 25-40 year age group (84% increase in mortality, NOT "COVID", right after "vaccine" roll out), don't look at Pfizer's safety trial data, don't look at the fact that Moderna patented SAR-COV-2 in 2016, three years before the start of the "pandemic"!
We must support Ukraine! No this is not Wag the Dog 2 YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
Oh look, Russia has invaded Ukraine, just in time! Look over there, look over there! Don't look at the death wave afflicting 25-40 year age group (84% increase in mortality, NOT "COVID", right after "vaccine" roll out), don't look at Pfizer's safety trial data, don't look at the fact that Moderna patented SAR-COV-2 in 2016, three years before the start of the "pandemic"!
We must support Ukraine! No this is not Wag the Dog 2 YOU CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
Related:
Joe Rogan + Dr. Peter McCullough https://open.spotify.com/episode/0aZte37vtFTkYT7b0b04Qz
Pathologist Dr Ryan Cole Delivers Concerning Message About COVID Vaccine and Long Term Impactshttps://www.bitchute.com/video/QYTNWSef4vMD/
This corroborates Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Byram Bridle's assessment of Japan's independent Pfizer mRNA non-vaccine (they categorized them as conventional vaccines rather than gene therapy technology to skirt safety studies that the latter would require, specifically, reproductive toxicity and genotoxicity studies, see my full analysis of Dr. Robert Malone's exchange with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Wolfgang Wodarg below) that showed that, contrary to what the "vaccine" manufacturers are telling the unwitting masses, that "don't worry, the spike protein inducing mRNA lipid nanoparticles remain at the intramuscular injection site", that these mRNA lipid nanoparticles travel the body, accumulate in the organs, and even cross the blood brain barrier and are extremely cyto-toxic (that is they induce cell death, organs are comprised of cells. This manifests as prion encephalopathy / mad cow related diseases in the brain, on top of blood clots, in the brain). Of particular concern was the magnitude of order greater concentration in the bone marrow, spleen and ovaries. (see a few posts down here where former Pfizer chief scientific officer and 28 year veteran immunologist Dr. Mike Yeadon is now advising all women of reproductive age to steer clear of these "vaccines").
Here, have a look, page 17:
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Pfizer-mRNA-goes-to-Ovaries.pdf
And here's my full analysis of Dr. Robert Malone's exchange with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Wolfgang Wodarg, I will excerpt the relevant points here:
Highlights (please go into this keeping in the back of your mind the equally plausible hypothesis that there is no novel coronavirus. Dr. Malone is still in the industry, he's still a consultant, and he strays heavily from conspiracy theorizing, he's extremely reserved. Nevertheless, he still confirms that an intentional release is not out of the realm of plausibility here)
First ~10 minutes: introduction and establishment of Malone's bonafides as the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology in question. Necessary viewing if youre unfamiliar with Dr. Malone.
10-15 minutes: are Reiner Fuellmich's Deutch translation of Malone's introduction.
24-29 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg presents the question of origin, intentional release is not ruled out by Malone. They also touch on regulatory capture of the regulatory agencies, the FDA and the legislature.
29 min mark: this is where it gets good, Malone confirms for all that the Moderna "vaccine" is the NIH vaccine and was funded by DARPA, the contract between NIH and Moderna were signed in December 2019 to develop the "vaccine" (bear in mind, first reported cases of SARS-COV-2 were a cluster of cases in Wubei Province in China in early January 2020. Also, bear in mind the proximity of Event 201 on the 18th of Oct, 2019, the tabletop training exercise hosted by The Bill Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab) simulating a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus.
Malone goes on to characterize the situation of regulatory capture as "The idea that the State is separate from Industry in the United States is no longer tenable, and I think this is an example that the German intellectuals are very aware of"
Fascism definition: The merger of state and corporate power.
Another lengthy translation into Deutch follows until the 34 min mark.
34 min mark: their PCR test expert presents question to Malone about cost benefit analysis, to include less expensive vaccines on offer in India in regards to cost, safety and efficacy.
Malone feels the need to place utmost emphasis on regulatory capture before going forward with this question. He mentions how the royalty payments from Moderna go into the salaries of 6 NIH employees working under Anthony Fauci.
36 min mark: Malone discloses conflict of interest as a consultant with an Indian pharmaceutical company, Reliance.
42 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg asks Malone about the previous mRNA animal trials in 2005 and about ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). Malone confirms the continued, repeated phenomenon of ADE in the trials. Malone goes on to say:
"That's why when I made a threat assessment after I was contacted by a US officer who was in Wuhan in the latter part of 2019 who gave me a phone call in the first week of 2020 and warned me I needed to get my team spun up I made a threat assessment and recommended repurposed drugs (Ivermectin) specifically because of the ADE history of (mRNA) coronavirus vaccine development." ~44 min mark
He then goes on to say:
"the clinical studies were not designed to detect ADE and that the phase 2, 3 studies were performed were not structured in a way that they would detect ADE should it happen" ~45 min mark
He then says that "the variants that are emerging are not showing a marked increase in anything that can be interpreted as an ADE result."
Bear in mind here, this exchange took place on the 9th of July and we have a more recent statement from Dr. Malone from two weeks ago where he does say that the variants seem to be the result of ADE and that "we are witnessing a worse case scenario in regards to ADE" (see previous recent post here)
Here's the best part of this exchange.
At the 48 min mark he gets to the root of the problem. The problem stems from the regulatory capture of the agencies (FDA and CDC) and the existing rules that allow the drug manufacturer to do their own safety studies. One particular consequence is the intentional categorization of these vaccines as conventional vaccines because then the regulatory safety is only concerned with the sterility of the injection device (the needle and vaccine) and the purity of what's in the vaccine itself NOT the behavior of the contents in the vaccine. He elaborates on this at the 50 min mark. So the safety studies were only concerned with established safety guidelines AROUND CONVENTIONAL VACCINES. If these were categorized as GENE THERAPY TECHNOLOGY which is what they actually are, then the safety studies would be concerned with the behavior of the technology, the mRNA lipid nanoparticles, where they travel in the body, and what consequences stem from that. ~50 min mark
51 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg adds to this, stating that in Germany they changed the definition of vaccines in 2009 to encompass Gene Therapy Technology. He surmises in anticipation of the need for this in the future, i.e., the roll out of a Fake Pandemic in 2020.
Malone responds with:
"The consequence of this decision, is that the regulators have treated the gene therapy products as traditional vaccines and they required, if you understand pharmaceuticals, they require rigorous characterization of the quantity, purity etc. of the material in the needle, but if you think this through, the active agent is the expressed protein antigen, and normally one would characterize with for a traditional vaccine exactly how much of that expressed protein is produced, where it goes, and for how long. In these cases the regulators have not done that, so we have no indication of the levels of spike produced, the distribution of spike produced and the duration of spike produced."
Wodarg: "We don't know the target"
Malone: "Well just so, we don't know the cells that they are infecting or transfecting....What we do know is that the adenovirus vector were designed for prolonged protein expression, the mRNA logic is that it enables shorter term drug like activity and then the RNA is degraded, but we don't know what the kinetics are (pharmacokinetics). So the regulators have, in many ways to my eyes, in looking at, for instance, the Japanese technical document (Japan's independent Pfizer BioNtech vaccine research) have been designed to give the right answer, the answer desired by the pharmaceutical companies, not the scientifically rigorous answer. The only explanation I can come up with is that the regulators didn't have sufficient background to comprehend the data they were shown and it's deficiencies. I wanted to make this key point, we do not understand how much protein is being made by any of these genetic vaccine technologies, where it's being made and for how long it's being made, and I believe that's a major oversight."
Fuellmich then states that "contrary to what these vaccine makers have told us, it doesn't stay at the injection site but moves anywhere in the body?"
Malone confirms and adds:
"In the case of Pfizer, they characterize the pharmaco-distribution, of the active drug material and the expression of the trans-gene, the encoded RNA, not using the final drug product but rather a surrogate, this is red flag number 1, that's not usually allowed, and they characterize the expression of spike in the animal models, they characterized the expression of luciferase, luciferase is the protein that makes the firefly tail glow.....so it's very sensitive reportaging because it's photons and we have photon cameras. Normally, the way the data is characterized is you dissect the animal and light the cells in each sample and then you can precisely calculate the amount of protein but we aren't even talking about spike protein but luciferase...there is a parlor trick that can be done with luciferase where you image the whole animal, you inject the luciferase and you can see the photons through the whole animal, however, you can appreciate that these photons get scattered as they are obstructed by bones and muscle tissue and you end up with a biased image that only shows the most expression. It's the least sensitive method. Based on that Pfizer asserts that the expression is localized just to the site of injection yet that's the method Pfizer used for their dossier, a highly biased assay, and this illustrates my point, I think that the regulatory authorities were not sufficiently technically expert, to comprehend, we have an expression in the states "pulling the wool over your eyes", to comprehend that Pfizer had selected the least sensitive method to characterize the distribution of a surrogate protein rather than the actual drug product."
60 min mark: "This feeds back into a point of a checklist used by regulators, with traditional vaccines geno-toxicity and reproductive toxicity are not required, with a gene therapy product they absolutely are required. In this case, by Pfizer's own admission in their protocol, the reproductive toxicology studies were not done rigorously and there were no geno-toxicity studies done. So we have, to be technically accurate, we have evidence of non-good laboratory practice studies of concentration of synthetic lipids into ovarian tissue, and spleen and bone marrow and other places you might expect them to distribute to but ovarian tissue is particularly concerning..."
63 min mark, concluding remarks:
Malone: "With all of this pressure from the governments, the press and the media, we are unable to meet the fundamentals of medical ethics that go back to the Nuremburg trials and those are, there must be complete disclosure of risk, those risks must be comprehended, and there has to be free willingness to accept the product, it cannot be coerced or enticed. Those are bedrock principles and these are currently experimental products and for some reason governments around the world have decided they can jettison these fundamental ethics and hastily implement these vaccines and do it in a universal way...and there's been this push to apply the aggregated risk that is almost completely concentrated among the elderly and obese to the entire population and using this to justify vaccinating the entire population with the logic that this will enable herd immunity, but it won't enable herd immunity because the vaccines aren't sterilizing for the virus and the whole logic, when you examine the underlying logic of what is being promoted and this is what gives rise to the conspiracy theories because clearly this logic we've applied to vaccine development for decades is not being followed"
Related:
Emergency Tuesday Broadcast: Shanghai’s Brutal Lockdowns COMING TO AMERICA 4-12-22 (InfoWars)
https://banned.video/watch?id=6255fd17253a6372de4b798b
Great reporting from Tucker Carlson as usual but I feel that he misses the opportunity to really pin the responsibility for the creation of the virus, (which remains to be properly isolated) on Fauci's shoulders where it belongs.
Related:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/new-docs-nih-owns-half-of-moderna-vaccine/
Dr. Malone Lays Out Why The Globalists Are Humanity’s #1 Threat (InfoWars) Malone Mega-Post
https://www.infowars.com/posts/dr-malone-lays-out-why-the-globalists-are-humanitys-1-threat/
by Kristi Leigh TV | Banned.Video
Dr. Robert Malone joins Kristi Leigh to break down the latest hit-piece against him, accusations he’s an operative, Elon Musk’s motives with Twitter, Dr. Ardis’ Covid origins hypothesis and how to fight back against the Great Reset.Related:
Yes, Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Gene Therapy Technology, the same technology used to create the "COVID" "vaccines". Imagine that. It's not some random "conspiracy theorist" like myself telling you all of this, it's the inventor of the technology in question saying this. He's not alone, we have former chief scientific officer at Pfizer 28 year veteran immunologist Mike Yeadon similarly speaking out against the Fake Pandemic. This is why the Deep State is pulling out all of the stops with the smear campaign. They want to both discredit Malone's involvement with the invention of mRNA GTT whilst also painting him as some kind of country bumpkin kook. As with Judy Mikovits, Steve Kirsch and others, they edited his Wikipedia entry to that end and of course, locked him out of editing his own entry.
Very early on in 2021 Dark Horse media hosted a lengthy 3 hour exchange between Bret Weinstein (Evolutionary Biologist, PhD), Steve Kirsch (Entrepreneur, who introduced Fluvoxamine), and Dr. Robert Malone where among other things, they discuss Dr. Byram Bridle's assessment of Japan's independent pharmacokinetic bio-distribution study showing that, contrary to the assurance of Pfizer, the mRNA lipid-nanoparticles do not remain at the intramuscular injection site but travel the body and accumulate in the spleen, bone marrow and ovaries at magnitude greater order (see page 17 of Japan's report)
This video was pulled from Youtube, Youtube claiming that it was "medical misinformation", which is clearly a lie.
Pfizer Vaccine is found in high concentrations in the Ovaries 48hr after dosage. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 targets the ACE2 receptor. "Changes in the activity of the local ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 pathway can result in fertility problems through the induction of ovarian diseases"
By u/Wearethevirus
After hearing that the Pfizer vaccine is found in high concentrations in the ovaries, and hearing anecdotes of woman having menstrual changes after being vaccinated, I decided to look further into it...
Pfizer animal testing document that was obtained by Dr. Byram Bridle through a FOI request to the Japanese government which shows the biodistribution of the lipid-nano particles throughout the bodies and organs of the test subjects. This is evidence that the lipid nanoparticles do not stay in the injection site, but instead travel all throughout the body (go to pg 16/23 for the charts showing biodistribution over the course of 48hrs): https://files.catbox.moe/0vwcmj.pdf
From this scientific paper, you can read that
" Changes in the activity of the local ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MAS1 pathway can result in fertility problems through the induction of ovarian diseases"
So the vaccine is found is found in high concentrations of the ovaries, then the spike protein attacks the ACE2 receptor.
Draw your own conclusions...
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Pfizer-mRNA-goes-to-Ovaries.pdf
Pathologist Dr Ryan Cole Delivers Concerning Message About COVID Vaccine and Long Term Impacts
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QYTNWSef4vMD/This corroborates Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Byram Bridle's assessment of Japan's independent Pfizer mRNA non-vaccine (they categorized them as conventional vaccines rather than gene therapy technology to skirt safety studies that the latter would require, specifically, reproductive toxicity and genotoxicity studies, see my full analysis of Dr. Robert Malone's exchange with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Wolfgang Wodarg below) that showed that, contrary to what the "vaccine" manufacturers are telling the unwitting masses, that "don't worry, the spike protein inducing mRNA lipid nanoparticles remain at the intramuscular injection site", that these mRNA lipid nanoparticles travel the body, accumulate in the organs, and even cross the blood brain barrier and are extremely cyto-toxic (that is they induce cell death, organs are comprised of cells. This manifests as prion encephalopathy / mad cow related diseases in the brain, on top of blood clots, in the brain). Of particular concern was the magnitude of order greater concentration in the bone marrow, spleen and ovaries. (see a few posts down here where former Pfizer chief scientific officer and 28 year veteran immunologist Dr. Mike Yeadon is now advising all women of reproductive age to steer clear of these "vaccines").
Here, have a look, page 17:
And here's my full analysis of Dr. Robert Malone's exchange with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Wolfgang Wodarg, I will excerpt the relevant points here:
Highlights (please go into this keeping in the back of your mind the equally plausible hypothesis that there is no novel coronavirus. Dr. Malone is still in the industry, he's still a consultant, and he strays heavily from conspiracy theorizing, he's extremely reserved. Nevertheless, he still confirms that an intentional release is not out of the realm of plausibility here)
First ~10 minutes: introduction and establishment of Malone's bonafides as the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology in question. Necessary viewing if youre unfamiliar with Dr. Malone.
10-15 minutes: are Reiner Fuellmich's Deutch translation of Malone's introduction.
24-29 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg presents the question of origin, intentional release is not ruled out by Malone. They also touch on regulatory capture of the regulatory agencies, the FDA and the legislature.
29 min mark: this is where it gets good, Malone confirms for all that the Moderna "vaccine" is the NIH vaccine and was funded by DARPA, the contract between NIH and Moderna were signed in December 2019 to develop the "vaccine" (bear in mind, first reported cases of SARS-COV-2 were a cluster of cases in Wubei Province in China in early January 2020. Also, bear in mind the proximity of Event 201 on the 18th of Oct, 2019, the tabletop training exercise hosted by The Bill Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab) simulating a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus.
Malone goes on to characterize the situation of regulatory capture as "The idea that the State is separate from Industry in the United States is no longer tenable, and I think this is an example that the German intellectuals are very aware of"
Fascism definition: The merger of state and corporate power.
Another lengthy translation into Deutch follows until the 34 min mark.
34 min mark: their PCR test expert presents question to Malone about cost benefit analysis, to include less expensive vaccines on offer in India in regards to cost, safety and efficacy.
Malone feels the need to place utmost emphasis on regulatory capture before going forward with this question. He mentions how the royalty payments from Moderna go into the salaries of 6 NIH employees working under Anthony Fauci.
36 min mark: Malone discloses conflict of interest as a consultant with an Indian pharmaceutical company, Reliance.
42 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg asks Malone about the previous mRNA animal trials in 2005 and about ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). Malone confirms the continued, repeated phenomenon of ADE in the trials. Malone goes on to say:
"That's why when I made a threat assessment after I was contacted by a US officer who was in Wuhan in the latter part of 2019 who gave me a phone call in the first week of 2020 and warned me I needed to get my team spun up I made a threat assessment and recommended repurposed drugs (Ivermectin) specifically because of the ADE history of (mRNA) coronavirus vaccine development." ~44 min mark
He then goes on to say:
"the clinical studies were not designed to detect ADE and that the phase 2, 3 studies were performed were not structured in a way that they would detect ADE should it happen" ~45 min mark
He then says that "the variants that are emerging are not showing a marked increase in anything that can be interpreted as an ADE result."
Bear in mind here, this exchange took place on the 9th of July and we have a more recent statement from Dr. Malone from two weeks ago where he does say that the variants seem to be the result of ADE and that "we are witnessing a worse case scenario in regards to ADE" (see previous recent post here)
Here's the best part of this exchange.
At the 48 min mark he gets to the root of the problem. The problem stems from the regulatory capture of the agencies (FDA and CDC) and the existing rules that allow the drug manufacturer to do their own safety studies. One particular consequence is the intentional categorization of these vaccines as conventional vaccines because then the regulatory safety is only concerned with the sterility of the injection device (the needle and vaccine) and the purity of what's in the vaccine itself NOT the behavior of the contents in the vaccine. He elaborates on this at the 50 min mark. So the safety studies were only concerned with established safety guidelines AROUND CONVENTIONAL VACCINES. If these were categorized as GENE THERAPY TECHNOLOGY which is what they actually are, then the safety studies would be concerned with the behavior of the technology, the mRNA lipid nanoparticles, where they travel in the body, and what consequences stem from that. ~50 min mark
51 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg adds to this, stating that in Germany they changed the definition of vaccines in 2009 to encompass Gene Therapy Technology. He surmises in anticipation of the need for this in the future, i.e., the roll out of a Fake Pandemic in 2020.
Malone responds with:
"The consequence of this decision, is that the regulators have treated the gene therapy products as traditional vaccines and they required, if you understand pharmaceuticals, they require rigorous characterization of the quantity, purity etc. of the material in the needle, but if you think this through, the active agent is the expressed protein antigen, and normally one would characterize with for a traditional vaccine exactly how much of that expressed protein is produced, where it goes, and for how long. In these cases the regulators have not done that, so we have no indication of the levels of spike produced, the distribution of spike produced and the duration of spike produced."
Wodarg: "We don't know the target"
Malone: "Well just so, we don't know the cells that they are infecting or transfecting....What we do know is that the adenovirus vector were designed for prolonged protein expression, the mRNA logic is that it enables shorter term drug like activity and then the RNA is degraded, but we don't know what the kinetics are (pharmacokinetics). So the regulators have, in many ways to my eyes, in looking at, for instance, the Japanese technical document (Japan's independent Pfizer BioNtech vaccine research) have been designed to give the right answer, the answer desired by the pharmaceutical companies, not the scientifically rigorous answer. The only explanation I can come up with is that the regulators didn't have sufficient background to comprehend the data they were shown and it's deficiencies. I wanted to make this key point, we do not understand how much protein is being made by any of these genetic vaccine technologies, where it's being made and for how long it's being made, and I believe that's a major oversight."
Fuellmich then states that "contrary to what these vaccine makers have told us, it doesn't stay at the injection site but moves anywhere in the body?"
Malone confirms and adds:
"In the case of Pfizer, they characterize the pharmaco-distribution, of the active drug material and the expression of the trans-gene, the encoded RNA, not using the final drug product but rather a surrogate, this is red flag number 1, that's not usually allowed, and they characterize the expression of spike in the animal models, they characterized the expression of luciferase, luciferase is the protein that makes the firefly tail glow.....so it's very sensitive reportaging because it's photons and we have photon cameras. Normally, the way the data is characterized is you dissect the animal and light the cells in each sample and then you can precisely calculate the amount of protein but we aren't even talking about spike protein but luciferase...there is a parlor trick that can be done with luciferase where you image the whole animal, you inject the luciferase and you can see the photons through the whole animal, however, you can appreciate that these photons get scattered as they are obstructed by bones and muscle tissue and you end up with a biased image that only shows the most expression. It's the least sensitive method. Based on that Pfizer asserts that the expression is localized just to the site of injection yet that's the method Pfizer used for their dossier, a highly biased assay, and this illustrates my point, I think that the regulatory authorities were not sufficiently technically expert, to comprehend, we have an expression in the states "pulling the wool over your eyes", to comprehend that Pfizer had selected the least sensitive method to characterize the distribution of a surrogate protein rather than the actual drug product."
60 min mark: "This feeds back into a point of a checklist used by regulators, with traditional vaccines geno-toxicity and reproductive toxicity are not required, with a gene therapy product they absolutely are required. In this case, by Pfizer's own admission in their protocol, the reproductive toxicology studies were not done rigorously and there were no geno-toxicity studies done. So we have, to be technically accurate, we have evidence of non-good laboratory practice studies of concentration of synthetic lipids into ovarian tissue, and spleen and bone marrow and other places you might expect them to distribute to but ovarian tissue is particularly concerning..."
63 min mark, concluding remarks:
Malone: "With all of this pressure from the governments, the press and the media, we are unable to meet the fundamentals of medical ethics that go back to the Nuremburg trials and those are, there must be complete disclosure of risk, those risks must be comprehended, and there has to be free willingness to accept the product, it cannot be coerced or enticed. Those are bedrock principles and these are currently experimental products and for some reason governments around the world have decided they can jettison these fundamental ethics and hastily implement these vaccines and do it in a universal way...and there's been this push to apply the aggregated risk that is almost completely concentrated among the elderly and obese to the entire population and using this to justify vaccinating the entire population with the logic that this will enable herd immunity, but it won't enable herd immunity because the vaccines aren't sterilizing for the virus and the whole logic, when you examine the underlying logic of what is being promoted and this is what gives rise to the conspiracy theories because clearly this logic we've applied to vaccine development for decades is not being followed"
Related:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g0X8oIkCTm0o/ https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804/ref=sr_1_1?keywords...
-
source: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/02/01/numbing-out-of-america-public-apathy-explained/ by Allen L Roland Connect the dots; the...
https://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2023/06/unto-final-chapter-of-great-reset.html
Into the Final Chapter of The Great Reset: Orchestrated Collapse by Way of Cyber Polygon and WW3 (Re-Post)
After being up for over a year (I was able to thwart their algorithmic censorship by omitting tags, tags are keywords that direct searche...
