The Hybrid Soul

For this blog-post, rather than reproduce an alternative news article, important documentary, podcast or another's blog-post I would like to share a brief excerpt from one of the books I am currently reading that really captured my attention and may possibly go some way in explaining why I feel like an outsider among Humanity, especially its Dominant Culture and seemingly suicidal collective behavior. This may also explain my firm belief that Humanity is not alone among the cosmos and most certainly not the most advanced. Also, as is implicit with the name of this blog, the concept of the evolution of consciousness, that just as with physical evolution, organisms exhibiting greater levels of sentience and self-awareness possess a commensurate level of spiritual evolution, such as other sentient beings in the Universe, particularly those with more sophisticated technology including FTL (Faster Than Light) space based travel, refined telepathic abilities and psychic healing modalities. (not that telepathy and psychic healing modalities are not a part of the Human Experience, just that with these more advanced interstellar civilizations they are culturally integrated and nurtured, a likely common feature among enduring civilizations. An emerging consensus is that Humanity now desperately needs to integrate Science and Spirituality if it is to survive a cascade of crises that are themselves an unintended consequence of Enlightenment Era consciousness, of Cartesian Dualism and Mechanistic Reductionism).

These ideas also gel surprisingly well with ideas from others whom I also respect and admire, among the Dr. Steven M. Greer and his highly recommend work Hidden Truth: Forbidden Knowledge

The book i am excerpting from  is Destiny of Souls: New Case Studies of Life Between Lives by Michael Newton. I believe this is the 3rd of a series pertaining to reincarnation and the sequel to Journey of Souls, which I have previously read and found surprisingly plausible. (Don't judge a book by its cover!)

FYI, my self-description here on this blog was written a year or two before reading Michael Newton's work, which has only reinforced my pre-existing beliefs. I also have long held the belief that re-incarnation is not limited to Earth, that we can re-incarnate onto any habitable planet throughout the Universe. I formed this belief in particular independent of any information gathered from my life experience thus far or sub-consciously from media or books. (I cannot possibly recall any movie, story or myth covering the possibility of Universal reincarnation). For this reason, I value these types of ideas, as their origin may be "non-local" in nature.

Before reading the following I feel the need to point out something as chances are very few reading this are familiar with Michael Newton's work with hypnotherapy. He is conversing with his patients who have been placed in a hypnotic state, allowing access to a deep layer of unconscious awareness and memories. He initially started his work with a desire to help people suffering from a neurosis, phobia or psychological complex rooted in early-life, mostly childhood trauma. What he began to discover was that some of his patients were reporting life experiences that were completely out of time and place for them, and upon further examination it has been concluded they are recalling experiences not only from earlier lives but from existence between lives on another plane altogether.

As with the previous excerpts presented here on this blog, there may be a few spelling errors as I am typing them out directly from the book.

The chapter is "Spiritual Energy Restoration".

My next case is an example of severe remodeling. Case 21 involves a particular class of soul I call the hybrid soul. In chapter 8, case 61 is another representative of this type of soul. I believe the hybrid souls are especially prone to self-destruction on Earth because they have incarnated on alien worlds before coming here fairly recently. There are hybrid souls who have great difficulty adapting to our planet. If I find this to be true, it is probable their first incarnation here was within the last few thousand years. The others have already adapted or left Earth for good. Less than a quarter of all my clients are able to recall memories of visiting other worlds between lives. This activity by itself does not make them hybrids. An even smaller percentage of my cases have memories of actually incarnating on alien worlds before they came to Earth. These are the hybrid souls. 

Thy hybrid is usually an older soul who, for a number of reasons, has decided to complete their physical lives on our planet. Their old worlds may no longer be habitable or they may have lived on a gentle world where life was just too easy and they want a difficult challenge with a world like Earth that has not yet reached its potential. Regardless of the circumstances for a soul leaving a world, I have found these former incarnations typically involve life forms which were slightly above, about equal, or slightly below the intelligence capabilities of the human brain.  This is by design. Hybrid souls who have formally incarnated on planets with civilizations possessing a much higher technology than Earth, such as those with space travel abilities, are smarter because they are an older race. Also, I have noticed that when I do have a hybrid soul as a client with former experience on a telepathic world, they tend to have greater psychic abilities than normal. 

Sometimes a hybrid client will confuse their early incarnations on other physical worlds with being on Earth until we sort out that their first world only resembled a place on Earth. Visions of once living on the island nation of Atlantis is a good example. Without discounting the possibility that Atlantis once existed on Earth thousands of years ago, I believe the source of many earthly myths come from our soul memories of former existences on other worlds. [emphasis mine]

I think hybrid soul is an appropriate term for those souls among us of mixed incarnation origins. Such souls have developed from being in hosts that are genetically different than humans. I have seen gifted people in this life who started their development on another world. Nevertheless, there is a dark side to this experience, as a level V subject in training to be a Restoration Master will explain. 

Case 21

Dr.N: Since you work with severely damaged souls, can you give me a little more information about your duties?

S: I'm in a special section working with those souls who have become lost in a morass of evil. 

Dr.N: (after learning this subject works only with those souls from Earth who have incarnated on other worlds before they came to Earth) In this section, are these the hybrid souls I have heard about? 

S: yes, in a restoration area where we deal with those who have become atrocity souls. 

Dr. N: What a terrible name to call a soul!

S: I'm sorry you are bothered by this, but what else would you call a being associated with acts of evil that are so serious they are unsalvageable in their present state?

Dr. N: I know, but the human body had a lot do do with...

S: (cutting me off) We don't consider that to be an excuse. 

Dr. N: Okay, then please continue with the nature of your work.

S: I am a second-stage restorer. 

Dr. N: What does that mean? 

S: When these souls lose their bodies, they are met by their guides and perhaps one close friend. That first stage does not last long and then the souls who have been involved with horrible acts are brought here to us. 

Dr. N: Why doesn't the first stage last as long as with other souls?

S: We don't want them to begin to forget the impact of their deeds--the harm and pain they caused on Earth. The second stage separates them from the uncontaminated souls. 

Dr. N: This sounds like you are running a leper colony. 

S: (abruptly) I am not amused by that remark. 

Dr. N: (after apologizing) You are not saying that all souls who commit evil acts are hybrid souls, as you define them? 

S: Of course not, that's my own section. But you should understand some real monsters on Earth are hybrids. 

Dr. N: I though the spirit world was a place of order with masters of superior knowledge. If these hybrid souls are contaminated abnormalities in human form--souls with the inability to adjust to the emotional makeup of the human body--why were they sent here? This indicates to me the spirit world is not infallible. 

S: A vast majority are fine, and they make great contributions to human society. You would have us deny all souls the opportunity to come to Earth because some turn out badly? 

Dr. N: No, of course not. Let's move on. What do you do with these souls? 

S: Others, way above me, examine their contaminated energy in light of just how the world of their earlier experience impacted on their human body. They want to know if this was an isolated case, or if other souls from that planet have had problems on Earth. If that is true, others souls from that world might not be permitted to come to Earth again. 

Dr. N: Please tell me more about your section. 

S: My area is not devoted to souls who have committed one serious act of wrongdoing. We work with habitually cruel lifestyles. These souls are then given a choice. We will do our est to clean up their energy by rehabilitation and if we think they are salvageable, they are offered a choice to come back to Earth in roles where they will receive the same type of pain they caused, only multiplied. 

Dr. N: Could a salvageable soul be one who committed terrible atrocities in life but showed great remorse? 

S: Probably. 

Dr. N: I thought karmic justice was not punitive? 

S: It's not The offer represents an opportunity for stabilization and redemption. It usually will take more than one life to endure an equal measure of the same kind of pain they caused to many people. That's why I said multiplied. 

Dr. N: Even so, I suppose most souls take this option? 

S: You are mistaken. Most are too fearful that they will fall again into the same patterns. They also lack the courage to be victims in a number of future lives. 

Dr. N: If they won't come back to Earth, then what do you do? 

S: These souls will then go the way of those souls we consider to be unsalvageable. We will then disseminate their energy. 

Dr. N: Is this a form of remodeling energy--or what? 

S: Ah ... yes ... we call it the breaking up of energy--that's what dissemination means. Certainly, it is remodeled. We break up their energy into particles. 

Dr. N: I though energy could not be destroyed. Aren't you destroying the identity of these contaminated souls? 

S: The energy is not destroyed, it is changed and converted. We might mix one particle of the old energy with nine particles of new fresh energy provided for our use. The dilution will make that which is contaminated ineffectual, but a small part of the original identity remains intact. 

Dr. N: So, the negative badness energy is mixed with overdoses of new goodness energy to render the contaminated soul harmless? 

S: Not necessarily goodness but freshness. 

Dr. N: Why would any soul resist dissemination? 

S: Even though those souls who accept these procedures for their own benefit recover and eventually lead productive lives on Earth and elsewhere ... there are souls who will not stand for any loss of identity. 

Dr. N: Then what happens to these souls who refuse your help? 

S: Many will just go into limbo, to a place of solitude. I don't know what will eventually happen to them. 

***

As I have said before, soul contamination does not only come from the physical body. Certainly, the energy damage described in the last two cases indicates that souls themselves are impure beings who also contribute to their own distress. 

Before continuing, I want to make a statement about karmic choices here that is important for all of us to keep in mind. When we see people who are victims of great adversity in life, this does not necessarily mean they were perpetrators of evil or wrongdoing of any kind in a former life. A soul with no such past associations might choose to suffer through a particular aspect of emotional pain to learn greater compassion and empathy for others by volunteering in advance for a life of travail....

See also: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/09/eben-alexander-harvard-neurosurgeon-proof-of-heaven-afterlife-coma_n_1951475.html

Days of Destruction

http://www.extraenvironmentalist.com/2013/05/20/episode-60-days-destruction/

While the cultural foundations of the United States are unraveling the unconscious programs of American society lay outside of public dialogue. Where there was once an American Dream, a spiritual void remains.  As the framework of consumer society breaks down, will an economic system of inverted totalitarianism reverse become explicit? Why do our elites seem incapable of formulating a rational response to this crisis of civilization?

In Extraenvironmentalist #60 we discuss the current condition of American culture with Chris Hedges and Morris Berman. Chris describes the process of breakdown he’s witnessed in other countries as elites withdraw when they feel their system of control crumbling. Morris reflects the current crisis of capitalism against the breakdown of the feudal system hundreds of years ago to describe a broader historical process. Then, we speak with Dmitry Orlov about his new book: The Five Stages of Collapse. Dmitry talks about the psychological damage created by access to large amounts of money and explains how to think practically about a failing global economic system.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:14:56 — 123.6MB) | Embed

Podcast (96kbps): Play in new window | Download (Duration: 2:15:15 — 92.9MB) | Embed

Naomi Wolf: My Creeping Concern That The NSA Leaker Is Not Who He Purports To Be

Via: cryptogon.com

June 15th, 2013

I’m still waiting for Snowden to release something, anything, that hasn’t been intuitively obvious to me for at least the past 15 years, and confirmed as fact since 2006/7 (Klein/Room641A).

If Snowden is the real deal, why are we having to contend with the corporate media censors to decide which sections of the documents we get to see and which ones we don’t?

Snowden, if you’re out there, what happens to the encrypted emails that come across the wire? Or, how does NSA run man in the middle attacks on SSL sessions? (Don’t hold your breath waiting for answers to these questions.)

Anyway, this spectacle is far from over. I’d suggest keeping your dial set somewhere between outright cynicism and ambivalence going forward.

Via: Facebook / Naomi Wolf:

I hate to do this but I feel obligated to share, as the story unfolds, my creeping concern that the NSA leaker is not who he purports to be, and that the motivations involved in the story may be more complex than they appear to be. This is in no way to detract from the great courage of Glenn Greenwald in reporting the story, and the gutsiness of the Guardian in showcasing this kind of reporting, which is a service to America that US media is not performing at all. It is just to raise some cautions as the story unfolds, and to raise some questions about how it is unfolding, based on my experience with high-level political messaging.

Some of Snowden’s emphases seem to serve an intelligence/police state objective, rather than to challenge them.

a) He is super-organized, for a whistleblower, in terms of what candidates, the White House, the State Dept. et al call ‘message discipline.’ He insisted on publishing a power point in the newspapers that ran his initial revelations. I gather that he arranged for a talented filmmaker to shoot the Greenwald interview. These two steps — which are evidence of great media training, really ‘PR 101? — are virtually never done (to my great distress) by other whistleblowers, or by progressive activists involved in breaking news, or by real courageous people who are under stress and getting the word out. They are always done, though, by high-level political surrogates.

b) In the Greenwald video interview, I was concerned about the way Snowden conveys his message. He is not struggling for words, or thinking hard, as even bright, articulate whistleblowers under stress will do. Rather he appears to be transmitting whole paragraphs smoothly, without stumbling. To me this reads as someone who has learned his talking points — again the way that political campaigns train surrogates to transmit talking points.

c) He keeps saying things like, “If you are a journalist and they think you are the transmission point of this info, they will certainly kill you.” Or: “I fully expect to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.” He also keeps stressing what he will lose: his $200,000 salary, his girlfriend, his house in Hawaii. These are the kinds of messages that the police state would LIKE journalists to take away; a real whistleblower also does not put out potential legal penalties as options, and almost always by this point has a lawyer by his/her side who would PROHIBIT him/her from saying, ‘come get me under the Espionage Act.” Finally in my experience, real whistleblowers are completely focused on their act of public service and trying to manage the jeopardy to themselves and their loved ones; they don’t tend ever to call attention to their own self-sacrifice. That is why they are heroes, among other reasons. But a police state would like us all to think about everything we would lose by standing up against it.

d) It is actually in the Police State’s interest to let everyone know that everything you write or say everywhere is being surveilled, and that awful things happen to people who challenge this. Which is why I am not surprised that now he is on UK no-fly lists – I assume the end of this story is that we will all have a lesson in terrible things that happen to whistleblowers. That could be because he is a real guy who gets in trouble; but it would be as useful to the police state if he is a fake guy who gets in ‘trouble.’

e) In stories that intelligence services are advancing (I would call the prostitutes-with-the-secret-service such a story), there are great sexy or sex-related mediagenic visuals that keep being dropped in, to keep media focus on the issue. That very pretty pole-dancing Facebooking girlfriend who appeared for, well, no reason in the media coverage…and who keeps leaking commentary, so her picture can be recycled in the press…really, she happens to pole-dance? Dan Ellsberg’s wife was and is very beautiful and doubtless a good dancer but somehow she took a statelier role as his news story unfolded…

f) Snowden is in Hong Kong, which has close ties to the UK, which has done the US’s bidding with other famous leakers such as Assange. So really there are MANY other countries that he would be less likely to be handed over from…

g) Media reports said he had vanished at one point to ‘an undisclosed location’ or ‘a safe house.’ Come on. There is no such thing. Unless you are with the one organization that can still get off the surveillance grid, because that org created it.

h) I was at dinner last night to celebrate the brave and heroic Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Several of Assange’s also brave and talented legal team were there, and I remembered them from when I had met with Assange. These attorneys are present at every moment when Assange meets the press — when I met with him off the record last Fall in the Ecuadoran embassy, his counsel was present the whole time, listening and stepping in when necessary.

Seeing these diligent attentive free-speech attorneys for another whisleblower reinforced my growing anxiety: WHERE IS SNOWDEN’S LAWYER as the world’s media meet with him? A whistleblower talking to media has his/her counsel advising him/her at all times, if not actually being present at the interview, because anything he/she says can affect the legal danger the whistleblower may be in . It is very, very odd to me that a lawyer has not appeared, to my knowledge, to stand at Snowden’s side and keep him from further jeopardy in interviews.

Again I hate to cast any skepticism on what seems to be a great story of a brave spy coming in from the cold in the service of American freedom. And I would never raise such questions in public if I had not been told by a very senior official in the intelligence world that indeed, there are some news stories that they create and drive — even in America (where propagandizing Americans is now legal). But do consider that in Eastern Germany, for instance, it was the fear of a machine of surveillance that people believed watched them at all times — rather than the machine itself — that drove compliance and passivity. (emphasis mine) From the standpoint of the police state and its interests — why have a giant Big Brother apparatus spying on us at all times — unless we know about it?

Naomi

http://media.portland.indymedia.org/media/2008/10/381133.pdf

The Atacama Mystery

More:  http://philosophersbunker.blogspot.com/2013/05/sirius-its-time-for-you-to-know.html

I Am Bradley Manning

http://www.collateralmurder.com/



Sign the petition to revoke The Sitting Murderer in Chief's Nobel "Peace" Prize and have it awarded to Bradley Manning:

http://act.rootsaction.org/p/salsa/web/tellafriend/public/?tell_a_friend_KEY=9192

Henry Kissinger was also awarded the Nobel "Peace" Prize.

See also:

http://prn.fm/2013/01/31/occupied-territory-013113/#ixzz2KFc7xDKt

Seeds Of Death

Self-Defense Defined

Well since its pretty clear that The Powers That Be, The 1%, the "Elites" or whatever you want to call them have been waging war against the majority of Humanity for some time now (Chemtrails, water Fluoridation, GMO everything, forced vaccinations, wage-slavery, mind control (see previous post) the socio-economic draft, the destruction of the environment etc. are all clearly a method of warfare, they all result in drastically reduced lifetimes and diminished quality of life) I think it is high time we abandon the strategy of a purely pacifist response and engage in Full Spectrum Revolution.

The definition of self-defense according to U.S. Law:

"The right for civilians acting on their own behalf to engage in a level of violence called reasonable force, or defensive force, for the sake of defending of ones own life or the lives of other including in certain circumstances the use of deadly force"

Peaceful protest and signing petitions would not have stopped Hitler and will not stop the Dominant Culture from destroying all life and rendering the planet uninhabitable, existence unbearable. If you love what good and beauty is left in this world, then you need to fight to protect it.

For all of the FBI and CIA fascists reading this, time to take a real good look in the mirror, you are not on the side of Truth and Justice.

YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED. 

On this and other relevant issues, two of the latest episodes of The Lifeboat Hour with Michael Ruppert that I cannot recommend more highly, hats off to Mike, superb work.

http://prn.fm/2013/05/26/lifeboat-hour-052613/#axzz2VBNDWE5J

Download, right click "save as"


http://prn.fm/2013/06/02/lifeboat-hour-060213/#axzz2VBNDWE5J

Download, right click "save as" 



http://www.endgamethebook.org/Excerpts/1-Premises.htm

Premises of Endgame

Premise One: Civilization is not and can never be sustainable. This is especially true for industrial civilization.

Premise Two: Traditional communities do not often voluntarily give up or sell the resources on which their communities are based until their communities have been destroyed. They also do not willingly allow their landbases to be damaged so that other resources—gold, oil, and so on—can be extracted. It follows that those who want the resources will do what they can to destroy traditional communities.

Premise Three: Our way of living—industrial civilization—is based on, requires, and would collapse very quickly without persistent and widespread violence.

Premise Four: Civilization is based on a clearly defined and widely accepted yet often unarticulated hierarchy. Violence done by those higher on the hierarchy to those lower is nearly always invisible, that is, unnoticed. When it is noticed, it is fully rationalized. Violence done by those lower on the hierarchy to those higher is unthinkable, and when it does occur is regarded with shock, horror, and the fetishization of the victims.

Premise Five: The property of those higher on the hierarchy is more valuable than the lives of those below. It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control—in everyday language, to make money—by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice.

Premise Six: Civilization is not redeemable. This culture will not undergo any sort of voluntary transformation to a sane and sustainable way of living. If we do not put a halt to it, civilization will continue to immiserate the vast majority of humans and to degrade the planet until it (civilization, and probably the planet) collapses. The effects of this degradation will continue to harm humans and nonhumans for a very long time.

Premise Seven: The longer we wait for civilization to crash—or the longer we wait before we ourselves bring it down—the messier will be the crash, and the worse things will be for those humans and nonhumans who live during it, and for those who come after.

Premise Eight: The needs of the natural world are more important than the needs of the economic system.

Another way to put premise Eight: Any economic or social system that does not benefit the natural communities on which it is based is unsustainable, immoral, and stupid. Sustainability, morality, and intelligence (as well as justice) requires the dismantling of any such economic or social system, or at the very least disallowing it from damaging your landbase.

Premise Nine: Although there will clearly some day be far fewer humans than there are at present, there are many ways this reduction in population could occur (or be achieved, depending on the passivity or activity with which we choose to approach this transformation). Some of these ways would be characterized by extreme violence and privation: nuclear armageddon, for example, would reduce both population and consumption, yet do so horrifically; the same would be true for a continuation of overshoot, followed by crash. Other ways could be characterized by less violence. Given the current levels of violence by this culture against both humans and the natural world, however, it’s not possible to speak of reductions in population and consumption that do not involve violence and privation, not because the reductions themselves would necessarily involve violence, but because violence and privation have become the default. Yet some ways of reducing population and consumption, while still violent, would consist of decreasing the current levels of violence required, and caused by, the (often forced) movement of resources from the poor to the rich, and would of course be marked by a reduction in current violence against the natural world. Personally and collectively we may be able to both reduce the amount and soften the character of violence that occurs during this ongoing and perhaps longterm shift. Or we may not. But this much is certain: if we do not approach it actively—if we do not talk about our predicament and what we are going to do about it—the violence will almost undoubtedly be far more severe, the privation more extreme.

Premise Ten: The culture as a whole and most of its members are insane. The culture is driven by a death urge, an urge to destroy life.

Premise Eleven: From the beginning, this culture—civilization—has been a culture of occupation.

Premise Twelve: There are no rich people in the world, and there are no poor people. There are just people. The rich may have lots of pieces of green paper that many pretend are worth something—or their presumed riches may be even more abstract: numbers on hard drives at banks—and the poor may not. These “rich” claim they own land, and the “poor” are often denied the right to make that same claim. A primary purpose of the police is to enforce the delusions of those with lots of pieces of green paper. Those without the green papers generally buy into these delusions almost as quickly and completely as those with. These delusions carry with them extreme consequences in the real world.

Premise Thirteen: Those in power rule by force, and the sooner we break ourselves of illusions to the contrary, the sooner we can at least begin to make reasonable decisions about whether, when, and how we are going to resist.

Premise Fourteen: From birth on—and probably from conception, but I’m not sure how I’d make the case—we are individually and collectively enculturated to hate life, hate the natural world, hate the wild, hate wild animals, hate women, hate children, hate our bodies, hate and fear our emotions, hate ourselves. If we did not hate the world, we could not allow it to be destroyed before our eyes. If we did not hate ourselves, we could not allow our homes—and our bodies—to be poisoned.

Premise Fifteen: Love does not imply pacifism.

Premise Sixteen: The material world is primary. This does not mean that the spirit does not exist, nor that the material world is all there is. It means that spirit mixes with flesh. It means also that real world actions have real world consequences. It means we cannot rely on Jesus, Santa Claus, the Great Mother, or even the Easter Bunny to get us out of this mess. It means this mess really is a mess, and not just the movement of God’s eyebrows. It means we have to face this mess ourselves. It means that for the time we are here on Earth—whether or not we end up somewhere else after we die, and whether we are condemned or privileged to live here—the Earth is the point. It is primary. It is our home. It is everything. It is silly to think or act or be as though this world is not real and primary. It is silly and pathetic to not live our lives as though our lives are real.

Premise Seventeen: It is a mistake (or more likely, denial) to base our decisions on whether actions arising from these will or won’t frighten fence-sitters, or the mass of Americans.

Premise Eighteen: Our current sense of self is no more sustainable than our current use of energy or technology.

Premise Nineteen: The culture’s problem lies above all in the belief that controlling and abusing the natural world is justifiable.

Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.

Modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the monetary fortunes of the decision-makers and those they serve.

Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the power of the decision-makers and those they serve.

Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are founded primarily (and often exclusively) on the almost entirely unexamined belief that the decision-makers and those they serve are entitled to magnify their power and/or financial fortunes at the expense of those below.

Re-modification of Premise Twenty: If you dig to the heart of it—if there were any heart left—you would find that social decisions are determined primarily on the basis of how well these decisions serve the ends of controlling or destroying wild nature.

Boston Bombing False Flag Update

Remember shortly after The Establishment found it an opportune time to declare that Osama Bin Laden had been killed during a purported raid on his compound in Pakistan that many if not most of the Navy SEAL Team involved with the raid died shortly after in a helicopter crash? Yes the same Osama Bin Laden who terminally ill, on kidney dialysis with dialysis technician in tow, by all accounts, died near Tora Bora in 2001? The same Osama Bin Laden whose body, central evidence of the raid, was conveniently dumped at sea "in accordance with Islamic tradition" (SINCE WHEN DO WE GIVE A FUCK ABOUT ISLAMIC TRADITION?!) Well FBI agents involved with the Boston Bombing False Flag have also mysteriously died during a training exercise!

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/27/305627/death-of-fbi-agents-creates-controversy/

As someone who was in the U.S. Army for eight years (C company, 25th Aviation Regiment, 25th Infantry Division, Operation Enduring Freedom 2004-2005) let me tell you how many deaths I have personally witnessed during basic training, AIT, 3-5 field deployments a year and a full year in Afghanistan: ZERO.

This includes throwing live hand grenades, low-crawling under live machine gun fire, the rifle range every 4-6 months, constantly handling explosives and ammunition, reloading aircraft munitions in near complete darkness under rotating main rotor blades, 12 mile road marches, rappelling down structures 5 stories high, being transported to and from on C-130's, UH-60 Blackhawks and CH-47 Chinooks, etc. etc.

ZERO WITNESSED TRAINING RELATED CASUALTIES.

EIGHT YEARS ACTIVE DUTY AND ONE YEAR DEPLOYMENT IN LAND-MINE RIDDLED SHINDAND, AFGHANISTAN, A COMBAT ZONE.

It's not as though training related accidents don't happen, they do, but statistically they are about as significant as getting struck by lightning. What if the headlines read "members of SEAL team involved with raid on Abbottabad compound struck by lightning" and then " FBI agents involved with investigating Boston Bombing Massacre also struck by lightning". When you have an operation involving parties who are not privy to what really happened, and then in the course of satisfying their curiosity they begin to suspect the truth, or you have members of an operation who have a change of heart, a sudden sense of conscience, well then you have to control these newly rogue elements. How do you do this? Plane crashes, helicopter crashes, training accidents involving helicopters and rappelling onto a ship at night etc. etc. Anything remotely plausible. Or as was the case with Pat Tillman, ex-NFL pro turned U.S. Army Ranger, who not only was familiar with but was actually corresponding with Noam Chomsky, someone who unlike the majority of poverty draftees and chauvinists who enlist, possessed critical thinking, who many believe began piecing together a geo-strategic puzzle while in Afghanistan and in the process became a political liability and was shot "accidentally" by members of his own squad. Fratricide happens. Is it common? Moreso than being struck by lightning but not very common. Pat Tillman was the only one to succumb to friendly fire in this particular incident, this fact among many other inconsistencies including the media and higher ups tried to cover up the incident point to foul play.

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/the_tillman_files.shtml

If you wan't to perpetuate a false narrative, an outright lie, a myth, well then you gotta take care of all the loose ends!

Oh and get this, the FBI questions someone allegedly with information in relation to the Tsarnaev brothers and shoots them 6 times in the front and one time to the back of the head! In self defense of course! No other witnesses or testimony other than the FBI agents implicated! We take their word!

If you execute someone by shooting them in the back of the head, well if you want to make it look like it was in self defense you should shoot them in the chest afterward! Trouble is, its kind of hard to undue shooting someone in the back of the head, unless you just burn or hide the body.

The father of Ibragim Todashev isn't so gullible and sheepishly trusting of authority as most Americans have been programmed to be, he doesn't buy the official story either:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/father-of-chechen-killed-in-florida-says-fbi-murdered-him/2013/05/30/f3d7f80c-c936-11e2-9245-773c0123c027_story.html

Oh and remember Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who allegedly wrote his confession on the interior of the boat where they tried unsuccessfully to shoot him to death? (how convenient that he write his confession while getting shot at, unfortunately the authorities will not actually release this evidence to the public, nor all of the images from the Boston Bombing False Flag event. Dzhokhar regained the ability to speak and during a six minute phone call with his mother he told her that he and his brother had nothing to do with the Boston Marathon False Flag!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10090370/Boston-bomb-suspect-Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-assures-parents-he-is-innocent.html

No coverage of this by the Mainstream Press! Too inconvenient to let that one out, gotta pump up the official narrative: The Evil Muslims hate us for our consumer freedoms! We need to spread Democracy and Freedom into Syria! (or wherever else the oil is). AND, we need to confiscate and make illegal "assault rifles" (more than 10 round capacity, see bottom)! AND, we need more internet security and greater surveillance (gotta control dissent such as this somehow)! AND, we need domestic aerial surveillance via Predator Drones! AND, we need to further militarize local and state Law Enforcement via "Fusion Centers". AND, we need to justify the flagrant miss-allocation of federal funds into said Police State including the dismantling of New Deal era "entitlement programs" (funny how that the portion of your income that is set aside for Social Security is considered an "entitlement" and subject to confiscation. "Hey remember all that money that you were forced to set aside for Social Security? Yeah well now we need it to surveil and, ahem, protect you, for your own security of course, and as always "For Freedom").

Yeah you know what I see? A Fascist Plutocracy posturing for civil unrest in the wake of massive unemployment and worsening inequality, for societal collapse.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini

How are Americans programmed? How else? You think your'e passively watching a movie (or playing a video game) that its not influencing your world-view, your perception of reality? Think again! This is how Mind Control works!

Reel Bad Arabs

Who benefits from Mind Control? Who is the man behind the curtain?

http://www.amazon.com/Thy-Will-Done-Rockefeller-Evangelism/dp/0060927232/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1370114907&sr=8-4&keywords=thy+will+be+done



More on Mind Control:



http://metanoia-films.org/

The Real Meaning of the Second Amendment 

Gun ownership is a constitutional guarantee, and therefore any discussion about the restriction of guns must be had in terms of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment Guarantees reads: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Many people on the pro-gun side of the argument wish to separate the first part of the amendment from the second, however the initial statement provides important context to the latter. The founding fathers realized that an armed American populace was necessary “to the security of the free state”; having just overthrown a tyrannical government the leaders of America knew how vital an armed citizen was to the victory against the oppressive British government. The concept of a citizen soldier is one of the most central pieces of our nation’s creation. Those that oppose gun ownership idea point out that we have a militia, the National Guard. The Army National Guard as it stands today is not the militia our founders envisioned, rather it is an extension of the Federal government, it can be federalized to put down any insurrection in the states, and ordered overseas. How is a militia of the citizens supposed to protect the people against a tyrannical Federal government when they are so closely entwined with the Army and the executive branch? Those that believe resistance to a tyrannical government is unfeasible are delusional. No American soldier is going to disarm attack or otherwise infringe on any American’s constitutional rights, for that is the document they swore an oath to. The militia men of old owned their own militia weapons and took them to war, returning home with those arms. Therefore, it only makes sense that the modern militiaman would keep and bear the arms of the militia: the semi-automatic rifle with a medium capacity magazine. Those who seek to disarm the American people of effective arms to wage war with only invite disaster upon all of us. It is the right and responsibility of every American citizen to defend our country from enemies foreign and domestic. But let us not argue about what the founding fathers intended, for they clearly stated:

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
- Thomas Jefferson

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
 - Alexander Hamilton

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined." - Patrick Henry

"To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." - George Mason

How are you supposed to defend a nation with 3 round hunting rifles and 9mm handguns? The sheep that cry for the constraining of the sheepdogs only invite the predation of the wolves.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/14/1178968/-The-Real-Meaning-of-the-Second-Amendment