Another excellent video from David Icke and a perfect segue from my most recent posts here. Also, as you can see in my vlog posted at the top of the post before last, I pointed out how Bill Gates proposed a partnership with Fauci at his private residence in the year 2000 (1:09 min mark, I recommend starting at 50 min mark for context) maybe you missed it, or maybe you waived it away as more conspiracy theorizing, but everything I stated in that video from March of this year has only been further corroborated, especially the fact that the "vaccines" don't prevent infection or transmission, and how the "COVID" cult adherents are now insisting that "they never said that they don't stop transmission!" when in fact they absolutely did and the entire justification for mandating them was the attainment of herd immunity and the notion that they prevented transmission. Here we are 8 months later and after the EU confronts Pfizer rep J. Small this is now a revelatory talking point, no it's actually not, we have been saying this and we have been pointing out how they would try to spin it, back-track, and memory hole the fact that they did indeed tell the masses that the "vaccines" would stop transmission and infection. I also covered the timing of Putin's invasion of Ukraine, his close affiliation with Klaus Schwab and the WEF and how all of this is a theatrical performance that is being rolled out now because they have lost control of the "pandemic" narrative. It's really an excellent summation of the "pandemic" and recent events that as more time goes by, and more events unfold and information revealed, is only further bolstered in it's premises.
As for Anthropogenic Climate Change, why would the very same actors behind the Fake Pandemic (Rockefellers, Standard Oil, Exxon) conduct their own studies in the 1980's and then conceal the results of which to the public?
Why would they engage in covert aerial spraying (chemtrails) for the primary purpose of slowing down the rate of change by reflecting UV insolation back into space via aluminum, barium and strontium?
Gates is now publicly promoting the idea of aerosol spraying when in fact they have been doing this covertly since the early 1990's.
Yes, they also can, do and are have the ability to manipulate the weather but you need to understand how much oil and petroleum derivatives we have been burning year over year, I'm talking BILLIONS of metric tons a year, and the only reason our planet is habitable to begin with is because of these heat trapping gases in the atmosphere. You mean to tell me adding considerably more to that is not going to change the way that that works? I mean this is unscientific in the extreme.
This is where I part ways with the Right and alt-Right. The actual science on the matter is unequivocal. Then this idea of glacial and interglacial cycles is bandied about, yes, I'm glad you pointed that out, because we are CURRENTLY AT THE END OF AN INTERGLACIAL CYCLE AND ARE SUPPOSED TO BE RETURNING TO A GLACIAL CYCLE. Then it's "well the entire solar system is experiencing climate change, look the icecaps on Mars are melting / growing, all of this is from solar activity", yes, I'm glad you pointed that out, BECAUSE WE ARE CURRENTLY IN A GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM.
As for the rest of my Malthusian musings, in regards to meat consumption, the problem isn't bovine flatulence, the problem is and always was water and top soil. You can derive 10x the number of calories if you were to eat the feed that is force fed to the animal that is then converted into animal protein. Did you know that 1 almond requires 1 gallon of water to grow? Here's an analogy, you have a 50 lb bag of almonds that you are feeding to chickens and the math works out that for every 10 lb of almonds you get half a pound of chicken animal protein. So, I don't know, 1000 gallons of water per lb of chicken protein? At what point does it dawn on you that you're better off simply eating the almonds directly, completely bypassing the animal cruelty, top soil and water loss, to say nothing of the heart clogging saturated fat problem inherent with meat consumption?
See this is why, when pondering option A: get the masses to understand that you can't live on a planet, completely ravage and literally wipe your ass with said planet, and expect it to remain habitable for very long and to voluntarily switch to a plant based diet vs option B: targeted eugenics via slow acting lethal injections. The masses, who have normalized clown car life, who think it's perfectly normal to convert the planet into one mass of sprawling highways and strip malls and that it's perfectly fine and normal to eat meat 3x a day while watching the Colorado river shrink to a trickle (gee, why is that happening?)
The masses will never voluntarily make such life changes. I have, and I've halted aging, vastly improved my mental, physical and spiritual health in the process. Remember, I'm suffering from Gulf War Illness from the Anthrax Vaccine, I should be much more worn down than I am, did you know that I'm the same age as Alex Jones? I'm turning 45 this year. Here, I look like I could pass for 35! Nearly everyone I served with, who continues to eat highly processed garbage, a meat centric diet, fluoride in the water, smokes and drinks, they all look like they could pass for 55!
Biological age: the age of your body in regards to cellular function and DNA telomere integrity.
Chronological age: your age in time.
You can have someone who eats GMO garbage, drinks fluoridated water, gets their aluminum and mercury "vaccines" on a regular basis, drinks alcohol and smokes, eats sugar etc and they can be 40 and look and feel like they are 60. Conversely, you can have someone who eats a plant based diet, exercises and meditates daily, doesn't drink nor smoke, removes the fluoride from their water, and they can chronologically be 60 but look and feel like they are 40.
I owe a lot of my health to Dr. Gary Null, whose daily podcast I've been listening to for well over a decade now. He also calls out the Fake Pandemic, he's a great alternative to Alex Jones if you're looking for solid information in regards to the real state of affairs via the state of the planet, health and healing etc.
If you've ever seen that video filmed of Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR method, calling Fauci a stooge, that's Dr. Gary Null doing the interviewing. Dr. Null was serial negative converting full blown HIV / AIDS patients via his healthy protocol consisting of a plant based diet, exercise and meditation, and 200g intravenous aqueous Vitamin C. He cured over 18 patients, who no longer had AIDS, who no longer tested positive for AIDS, and he held a press conference with all of them present to offer testimony and he invited the mainstream press and no-one showed.
Excerpt from Endgame by Derrick Jensen
From chapter "Premises"
Premise One: Civilization is not and can never be sustainable. This is especially true for industrial civilization.
Premise Two: Traditional communities do not often voluntarily give up or sell the resources on which their communities are based until their communities have been destroyed. They also do not willingly allow their landbases to be damaged so that other resources—gold, oil, and so on—can be extracted. It follows that those who want the resources will do what they can to destroy traditional communities.
Premise Three: Our way of living—industrial civilization—is based on, requires, and would collapse very quickly without persistent and widespread violence.
Premise Four: Civilization is based on a clearly defined and widely accepted yet often unarticulated hierarchy. Violence done by those higher on the hierarchy to those lower is nearly always invisible, that is, unnoticed. When it is noticed, it is fully rationalized. Violence done by those lower on the hierarchy to those higher is unthinkable, and when it does occur is regarded with shock, horror, and the fetishization of the victims.
Premise Five: The property of those higher on the hierarchy is more valuable than the lives of those below. It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control—in everyday language, to make money—by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice.
Premise Six: Civilization is not redeemable. This culture will not undergo any sort of voluntary transformation to a sane and sustainable way of living. If we do not put a halt to it, civilization will continue to immiserate the vast majority of humans and to degrade the planet until it (civilization, and probably the planet) collapses. The effects of this degradation will continue to harm humans and nonhumans for a very long time.
Premise Seven: The longer we wait for civilization to crash—or the longer we wait before we ourselves bring it down—the messier will be the crash, and the worse things will be for those humans and nonhumans who live during it, and for those who come after.
Premise Eight: The needs of the natural world are more important than the needs of the economic system.
Another way to put premise Eight: Any economic or social system that does not benefit the natural communities on which it is based is unsustainable, immoral, and stupid. Sustainability, morality, and intelligence (as well as justice) requires the dismantling of any such economic or social system, or at the very least disallowing it from damaging your landbase.
Premise Nine: Although there will clearly some day be far fewer humans than there are at present, there are many ways this reduction in population could occur (or be achieved, depending on the passivity or activity with which we choose to approach this transformation). Some of these ways would be characterized by extreme violence and privation: nuclear armageddon, for example, would reduce both population and consumption, yet do so horrifically; the same would be true for a continuation of overshoot, followed by crash. Other ways could be characterized by less violence. Given the current levels of violence by this culture against both humans and the natural world, however, it’s not possible to speak of reductions in population and consumption that do not involve violence and privation, not because the reductions themselves would necessarily involve violence, but because violence and privation have become the default. Yet some ways of reducing population and consumption, while still violent, would consist of decreasing the current levels of violence required, and caused by, the (often forced) movement of resources from the poor to the rich, and would of course be marked by a reduction in current violence against the natural world. Personally and collectively we may be able to both reduce the amount and soften the character of violence that occurs during this ongoing and perhaps longterm shift. Or we may not. But this much is certain: if we do not approach it actively—if we do not talk about our predicament and what we are going to do about it—the violence will almost undoubtedly be far more severe, the privation more extreme.
Premise Ten: The culture as a whole and most of its members are insane. The culture is driven by a death urge, an urge to destroy life.
Premise Eleven: From the beginning, this culture—civilization—has been a culture of occupation.
Premise Twelve: There are no rich people in the world, and there are no poor people. There are just people. The rich may have lots of pieces of green paper that many pretend are worth something—or their presumed riches may be even more abstract: numbers on hard drives at banks—and the poor may not. These “rich” claim they own land, and the “poor” are often denied the right to make that same claim. A primary purpose of the police is to enforce the delusions of those with lots of pieces of green paper. Those without the green papers generally buy into these delusions almost as quickly and completely as those with. These delusions carry with them extreme consequences in the real world.
Premise Thirteen: Those in power rule by force, and the sooner we break ourselves of illusions to the contrary, the sooner we can at least begin to make reasonable decisions about whether, when, and how we are going to resist.
Premise Fourteen: From birth on—and probably from conception, but I’m not sure how I’d make the case—we are individually and collectively enculturated to hate life, hate the natural world, hate the wild, hate wild animals, hate women, hate children, hate our bodies, hate and fear our emotions, hate ourselves. If we did not hate the world, we could not allow it to be destroyed before our eyes. If we did not hate ourselves, we could not allow our homes—and our bodies—to be poisoned.
Premise Fifteen: Love does not imply pacifism.
Premise Sixteen: The material world is primary. This does not mean that the spirit does not exist, nor that the material world is all there is. It means that spirit mixes with flesh. It means also that real world actions have real world consequences. It means we cannot rely on Jesus, Santa Claus, the Great Mother, or even the Easter Bunny to get us out of this mess. It means this mess really is a mess, and not just the movement of God’s eyebrows. It means we have to face this mess ourselves. It means that for the time we are here on Earth—whether or not we end up somewhere else after we die, and whether we are condemned or privileged to live here—the Earth is the point. It is primary. It is our home. It is everything. It is silly to think or act or be as though this world is not real and primary. It is silly and pathetic to not live our lives as though our lives are real.
Premise Seventeen: It is a mistake (or more likely, denial) to base our decisions on whether actions arising from these will or won’t frighten fence-sitters, or the mass of Americans.
Premise Eighteen: Our current sense of self is no more sustainable than our current use of energy or technology.
Premise Nineteen: The culture’s problem lies above all in the belief that controlling and abusing the natural world is justifiable.
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
Modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the monetary fortunes of the decision-makers and those they serve.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the power of the decision-makers and those they serve.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are founded primarily (and often exclusively) on the almost entirely unexamined belief that the decision-makers and those they serve are entitled to magnify their power and/or financial fortunes at the expense of those below.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: If you dig to the heart of it—if there were any heart left—you would find that social decisions are determined primarily on the basis of how well these decisions serve the ends of controlling or destroying wild nature.
From chapter "Premises"
Premise One: Civilization is not and can never be sustainable. This is especially true for industrial civilization.
Premise Two: Traditional communities do not often voluntarily give up or sell the resources on which their communities are based until their communities have been destroyed. They also do not willingly allow their landbases to be damaged so that other resources—gold, oil, and so on—can be extracted. It follows that those who want the resources will do what they can to destroy traditional communities.
Premise Three: Our way of living—industrial civilization—is based on, requires, and would collapse very quickly without persistent and widespread violence.
Premise Four: Civilization is based on a clearly defined and widely accepted yet often unarticulated hierarchy. Violence done by those higher on the hierarchy to those lower is nearly always invisible, that is, unnoticed. When it is noticed, it is fully rationalized. Violence done by those lower on the hierarchy to those higher is unthinkable, and when it does occur is regarded with shock, horror, and the fetishization of the victims.
Premise Five: The property of those higher on the hierarchy is more valuable than the lives of those below. It is acceptable for those above to increase the amount of property they control—in everyday language, to make money—by destroying or taking the lives of those below. This is called production. If those below damage the property of those above, those above may kill or otherwise destroy the lives of those below. This is called justice.
Premise Six: Civilization is not redeemable. This culture will not undergo any sort of voluntary transformation to a sane and sustainable way of living. If we do not put a halt to it, civilization will continue to immiserate the vast majority of humans and to degrade the planet until it (civilization, and probably the planet) collapses. The effects of this degradation will continue to harm humans and nonhumans for a very long time.
Premise Seven: The longer we wait for civilization to crash—or the longer we wait before we ourselves bring it down—the messier will be the crash, and the worse things will be for those humans and nonhumans who live during it, and for those who come after.
Premise Eight: The needs of the natural world are more important than the needs of the economic system.
Another way to put premise Eight: Any economic or social system that does not benefit the natural communities on which it is based is unsustainable, immoral, and stupid. Sustainability, morality, and intelligence (as well as justice) requires the dismantling of any such economic or social system, or at the very least disallowing it from damaging your landbase.
Premise Nine: Although there will clearly some day be far fewer humans than there are at present, there are many ways this reduction in population could occur (or be achieved, depending on the passivity or activity with which we choose to approach this transformation). Some of these ways would be characterized by extreme violence and privation: nuclear armageddon, for example, would reduce both population and consumption, yet do so horrifically; the same would be true for a continuation of overshoot, followed by crash. Other ways could be characterized by less violence. Given the current levels of violence by this culture against both humans and the natural world, however, it’s not possible to speak of reductions in population and consumption that do not involve violence and privation, not because the reductions themselves would necessarily involve violence, but because violence and privation have become the default. Yet some ways of reducing population and consumption, while still violent, would consist of decreasing the current levels of violence required, and caused by, the (often forced) movement of resources from the poor to the rich, and would of course be marked by a reduction in current violence against the natural world. Personally and collectively we may be able to both reduce the amount and soften the character of violence that occurs during this ongoing and perhaps longterm shift. Or we may not. But this much is certain: if we do not approach it actively—if we do not talk about our predicament and what we are going to do about it—the violence will almost undoubtedly be far more severe, the privation more extreme.
Premise Ten: The culture as a whole and most of its members are insane. The culture is driven by a death urge, an urge to destroy life.
Premise Eleven: From the beginning, this culture—civilization—has been a culture of occupation.
Premise Twelve: There are no rich people in the world, and there are no poor people. There are just people. The rich may have lots of pieces of green paper that many pretend are worth something—or their presumed riches may be even more abstract: numbers on hard drives at banks—and the poor may not. These “rich” claim they own land, and the “poor” are often denied the right to make that same claim. A primary purpose of the police is to enforce the delusions of those with lots of pieces of green paper. Those without the green papers generally buy into these delusions almost as quickly and completely as those with. These delusions carry with them extreme consequences in the real world.
Premise Thirteen: Those in power rule by force, and the sooner we break ourselves of illusions to the contrary, the sooner we can at least begin to make reasonable decisions about whether, when, and how we are going to resist.
Premise Fourteen: From birth on—and probably from conception, but I’m not sure how I’d make the case—we are individually and collectively enculturated to hate life, hate the natural world, hate the wild, hate wild animals, hate women, hate children, hate our bodies, hate and fear our emotions, hate ourselves. If we did not hate the world, we could not allow it to be destroyed before our eyes. If we did not hate ourselves, we could not allow our homes—and our bodies—to be poisoned.
Premise Fifteen: Love does not imply pacifism.
Premise Sixteen: The material world is primary. This does not mean that the spirit does not exist, nor that the material world is all there is. It means that spirit mixes with flesh. It means also that real world actions have real world consequences. It means we cannot rely on Jesus, Santa Claus, the Great Mother, or even the Easter Bunny to get us out of this mess. It means this mess really is a mess, and not just the movement of God’s eyebrows. It means we have to face this mess ourselves. It means that for the time we are here on Earth—whether or not we end up somewhere else after we die, and whether we are condemned or privileged to live here—the Earth is the point. It is primary. It is our home. It is everything. It is silly to think or act or be as though this world is not real and primary. It is silly and pathetic to not live our lives as though our lives are real.
Premise Seventeen: It is a mistake (or more likely, denial) to base our decisions on whether actions arising from these will or won’t frighten fence-sitters, or the mass of Americans.
Premise Eighteen: Our current sense of self is no more sustainable than our current use of energy or technology.
Premise Nineteen: The culture’s problem lies above all in the belief that controlling and abusing the natural world is justifiable.
Premise Twenty: Within this culture, economics—not community well-being, not morals, not ethics, not justice, not life itself—drives social decisions.
Modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the monetary fortunes of the decision-makers and those they serve.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are determined primarily (and often exclusively) on the basis of whether these decisions will increase the power of the decision-makers and those they serve.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: Social decisions are founded primarily (and often exclusively) on the almost entirely unexamined belief that the decision-makers and those they serve are entitled to magnify their power and/or financial fortunes at the expense of those below.
Re-modification of Premise Twenty: If you dig to the heart of it—if there were any heart left—you would find that social decisions are determined primarily on the basis of how well these decisions serve the ends of controlling or destroying wild nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.