I promised I would listen to the full exchange between Dr. Drew and Dr. Zelenko that I shared in my previous post and having doing so I have four major issues in particular with ideas or assertions made by Dr. Drew and a few made by Zelenko.
1. At the 33:38 mark, in regards to"vaccination" post-infection, Drew regurgitates this latest Pharma industry buzz-word: "Hybrid Immunity". In response, Zelenko responds by basically unloading the full agenda of Gates, Schwab and the rest of the .01% "elite" because at this point Zelenko does not care anymore and realizes that Drew is either living in another dimension or is a shill. There is no such thing as "Hybrid Immunity". The "vaccines" do NOT, in any way shape or form augment or enhance Natural Immunity. IN FACT, they harm natural immunity. This has been borne out many times by many scientists ad nauseum:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/repeated-covid-vaccines-impair-immune-system/
Immune erosion by COVID-19 injectionsAdded to this was mounting concern among scientists, such as renowned Belgian vaccinologist Geert Vanden Bossche Ph.D., that successive COVID-19 injections may compromise the effectiveness of the immune system, especially trained innate immunity gained following naturally-acquired infection.
Vanden Bossche has proposed that high levels of non-sterilizing (“leaky”) “vaccinal” antibodies produced following injection, suppress all-important, polyreactive, antibodies produced by specialized subsets of B cells (B-1 and marginal zone B cells) associated with the innate immune system. -
Q&A with Geert Vanden Bossche #1
Question:
Should vaccinated people go get their booster shots or not?
Answer:
From an immunological point of view, boosters and mass vaccination in general are as harmful as mold on a wall.
The vaccine can not prevent infection nor transmission. By again increasing the antibodies (with the booster), the virus is put under an even higher immune pressure while further expanding its capacity to escape from the vaccinal antibodies (Abs). As a result more infectious variants gain a competitive advantage and hence, will spread stronger amongst the population. This only precipiates and expands the evolutionary capacity of the virus to resist the vaccines. The level of protection WHO has recently been claiming (40%) is anything but due to the vaccines and can only be ascribed to some ‘trained’ innate immunity large parts of the population acquired prior to vaccination as a result of asymptomatic/ mild infection. It is crystal clear, indeed, that none of the C-19 vaccines is capable of blocking transmission, not even by 1 % ! Because vaccinal Abs suppress relevant innate Abs, these vaccines have no capacity whatsoever to confer sterilizing immunity. Consequently, none of these vaccines help to build herd immunity; on the contrary, they generate a breeding ground in vaccinees for more infectious variants, thereby further increasing infection rates and threatening both the unvaccinated and vaccinated. Moreover, vaccinal Abs tend to outcompete innate Abs for binding to SARS-CoV-2 because of their higher affinity for the virus. This particularly applies to naive innate Abs (children!) and already explains why C-19 vaccination is at risk of dramatically weakening people’s first line of immune defense, especially in children. Our innate immunity is not only well armed to protect against COVID-19 (including all its variants!), but also against a number of other viruses causing acute respiratory disease.
There can be no doubt, therefore, that such an assault of our immune system will have dramatic consequences on both individual and public health. Basically, mass vaccination is now turning Covid-19 into a disease of young and healthy unvaccinated people while enabling the virus to break through both the innate and adaptive immune defense of vaccinees due to vaccine-mediated suppression of innate Abs and viral resistance to vaccinal Abs, respectively. For those who didn’t get it thus far, Omicron will repeat that lesson; its teaching will only be a bit tougher and will soon silence all those who are trying to convince their people that they can outsmart the virus and, as they ridiculously claim, ‘stay ahead of the virus’.
2. Claim: Natural immunity wanes quickly whereas the "vaccine" does not.
Rubbish! In fact the opposite is irrefutably the case!
3. Claim: Around 1:19:14 a guest host asks how this could be pulled off in broad daylight without the knowledge of doctors, politicians and scientists.
Zelenko responds with the obvious and correct answer that they are NOT hiding it. Schwab refers to the Great Reset as "the 4th Industrial Revolution" where "the 4th Industrial Revolution doesn't change what you were doing, it changes you, if we take gene editing for example". They aren't even hiding it. Also, derided as far right "conspiracy theory" for decades now, levied at Alex Jones in particular, the claim that the "elite" have been talking about and plotting the formation of a global governance structure, referred to as The New World Order, the opening speaker at Klaus Schwab's Global Government Summit held in Dubai on the 3rd of April refers to this as The New World Order and we just had Biden refer to the New World Oder recently (and Bush Sr., and Kissinger before them, on video, decades ago). Schwab's chief underling, Yuval Noah Harari has stated, verbatim, that "the days of free will are over" and "humans are now hackable animals". These recorded statements can be found in nearly every other post here going back for at least two weeks now. And now multiple researchers have found the presence of both graphene oxide and nano-scale structures that self assemble in response to specific EMF frequencies, which is a good segue into the following statements by both Drew and Zelenko.
4. Claim: The "vaccines" don't alter your DNA.
At one point, I'm trying to find it, Zelenko talks about how the "vaccines" can edit your genes, and Drew challenges this, regurgitating the early, and now refuted, industry statement about how the cell instructions to product spike are only mRNA based and that "don't worry they don't change your DNA". Zelenko does correctly respond that actually they change your DNA in only 6 hours but doesn't mention how this happens in the liver or anything else. He could have thoroughly destroyed this lie here but doesn't:
5. Claim: The nano-technology only sends information and relies on external power, presumably EMF.
When describing the N3 patent (Next Generation Nanotechnology, see Iceni's Spartacus paper), Zelenko mentions that the nanotechnology will have biometric sensing and communication capability, what he either doesn't full comprehend or has yet to discover is that this communication is bi-directional, meaning, not only can the nano-routers send information, they can also receive information. Not only that, Zelenko does not mention that these nano-routers can self assemble and form circuits. Not only that, but they can cross the blood brain barrier and THEN self assemble in to circuits within the brain and then interface with the brain to send AND receive signal. They can up and down-regulate neurotransmitter production. Is Klaus Schwab's oft mentioned "You will own nothing and be happy" catch-phrase from his quickly printed "COVID-19: The Great Reset" playbook given to all of his Young Global Leaders starting to make sense? The capability of the self-assembled circuits of nano-routers is not just limited to up and down regulation of neurotransmitters. Say you have become politically disillusioned with The Great Reset, this technology could attenuate 5G frequency with lethal outcome or they could drive you into a blinding mad fit of rage, which may be tactically advantageous if you want to either depopulate or create enough strife to justify declaring martial law and deploying the national guard. The possibilities with this technology are near limitless.
Also, Zelenko doesn't mention it, but the whole point of Graphene is that it's nearly indestructible and an incredibly efficient conductor of heat, the nano-technology doesn't require external power, it can function via body heat.
In conclusion, watching the exchange in full has only bolstered my initial assessment of Dr. Drew, he's either a shill of someone who was unwittingly bamboozled into the "pandemic" narrative and is now engaged in face-saving as early on he recommended the "vaccines" to a very large audience and cannot, not now, not ever, walk that back, re-examine his original position and admit error because any proper, adequate analysis of the "vaccines" in regard to Natural Immunity would leave one with the conclusion that they erode the immune system. The Id / Ego is capable of facilitating incredible mental gymnastics as a self-defense mechanism. Dr. Drew would have to process the fact that he consigned untold numbers of his listeners to death and / or robotization and thus he cannot and will not ever stray from the official "pandemic" and "vaccine" narrative, hence this mental gymnastic display about "Hybrid Immunity".
There is no such thing as "Hybrid Immunity". If you've encountered "SARS-COV-2" you have durable, long lasting, near permanent immunity not just to the Alpha variant but any current and future variants. Remember, those who encountered SARS-COV-1 in 2003, 18 years ago, have immunity against SARS-COV-2 and there is a 20% difference in virus structure whereas SARS-COV-2 Delta is only .3% different than Alpha:
The "vaccines" destroy your immune system, whether or not you've attained Natural Immunity through exposure to SARS-COV-2 or not.
In closing, one more thing, at the beginning of the exchange it's established between both Zelenko and Drew that Zelenko is recovering from "COVID" after hospitalization and the use of steroids (this is probably the only reason Drew hosted Zelenko at all, to get a member of the "conspiracy theorist" community to come on air and say they had "COVID" and had a bad time with it at that). How does Zelenko know that he actually had "COVID" and not seasonal influenza? Did you know that over 70k died from seasonal flu in 2018 in the U.S. (670k globally)? How was this "COVID" diagnosis derived, PCR test at 40 amplification cycles that can't distinguish between seasonal flu and computerized sequence called "SARS-COV-2"?
Recommended reading:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.