Lancet Preprint Showing COVID-19 Vaccine Responsible for 74% of Deaths - REMOVED!

https://drpanda.substack.com/p/lancet-preprint-showing-covid-19

A preprint review of 325 autopsies found that COVID-19 vaccine was the cause of death in 73.9% of the cases - 24 hours later the study was removed.

DR PANDA
JUL 7, 2023




This preprint study was submitted to the Lancet, a prestigious medical journal. The study was removed in less than 24 hours.

The review in question was a pre-print undergoing the process of peer review. It was written by Dr. Peter A. McCullough, a highly prolific cardiologist in the United States, along with Dr. Harvey Risch, an epidemiologist from Yale University, and various other individuals associated with the Wellness Company.

Despite garnering significant attention with hundreds of downloads a minute and media coverage, the study was subsequently taken down and replaced with a message stating:


“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

 

The original papers abstract:

Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.

Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

Funding: None.

Declaration of Interest: Drs Alexander, Amerling, Hodkinson, Makis, McCullough, Risch, Trozzi are affiliated with and receive salary support and or hold equity positions in The Wellness Company, Boca Raton, FL which had no role in funding, analysis, or publication.

Keywords: autopsy, necropsy, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, death, excess mortality, spike protein, organ system

Follow The Science

Unfortunately ‘follow the science’ really means follow the science we want you to see. In 2020 the Lancet published (later retracted) a paper claiming hydroxychloroquine caused severe cardiac complications based on fake data.

The Lancet has also retracted a 12 year old “landmark” study that connected MMR vaccines to autism.

A preprint study that showed Vitamin D led to a reduction in ICU admission and COVID deaths, removed.

And many more…. The Lancet is no more than a pharma mouthpiece.

It’s hard to find a good reason why this preprint which was written by reputable doctors was removed. Preprints inherently undergo peer review, wherein constructive criticism is provided and necessary revisions are made. The extent of censorship demonstrated by the Lancet in this situation is severe.

The censorship by the Lancet only amplified the study. Dr. Peter McCullough reports he will still seek peer review. The people will find out the truth!