Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world - even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet… we never seem to believe them.
The Stew Peters Network is proud to present DIED SUDDENLY, from the award winning filmmakers, Matthew Skow and Nicholas Stumphauzer. They are the minds behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES, and now have a damning presentation on the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.
This documentary was made possible by Goldco. Protect your wealth by investing in precious metals, and use THIS link to receive up to $10,000 in free silver for qualified accounts: https://link.goldco.com/DiedSuddenly
The Stew Peters Network would not be possible without the loyal and endearing support of all our sponsors. There is something for EVERYONE!
In this episode of ICIC, Dr Reiner Fuellmich and co-host Dr Mike Yeadon have an insightful conversation with four experts on this explosive topic.
Using dark-field microscopy, Dr David Nixon examines blood samples from people who have been injected with mRNA-based substances and explains the results with corresponding images. Crystalline, unnatural structures are revealed, which change in further observation and show characteristics of a kind of nano- or micro-technology.
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea is intensively involved with the ingredients of the Covid mRNA substances. In particular, also with the so-called "shedding effect" of which it is assumed that harmful excretions can be transferred from "vaccinated" to "unvaccinated".
Karen Kingston, whose research interests include toxicology and the analysis of clinical data as well as the ingredients of the covid mRNA substances, complains that all measures regarding a functioning quality assurance management in the administration of a so-called novel "vaccination" to billions of people worldwide have failed and are still not being implemented after the already poor data situation.
For electrical engineer Shimon Yanowitz, the results of his research have shown that it is a kind of micro-technology, as the injected substances change strangely in the human body and have characteristics of electronic circuits. It is also disturbing that the lipid nanoparticles found in the substances have been approved as "technical devices", as Karen Kingston reports.
Fantastic exchange, I'm so glad Mike Yeadon was a part of this to lend healthy skepticism and ensure that proper and rigorous scientific methodology is adhered to. Great input and exchange by all participants. This is exactly what we need.
Please support independent investigative journalism!
Below is further analysis pertaining to the topics Steve covers in this update. I wish I didn't bury this content from Amazing Polly so quickly as it's probably the most important thing I've viewed all week, and as you can tell, I'm up to my eyeballs in research. I've also included the video by Dr. Mike Yeadon referred to in Steve's update, former chief scientific officer at Pfizer and 28 year veteran immunologist.
I've also included my own personal analysis of the relatively recent shooting at Uvalde and how the Cabal behind the Fake Pandemic will orchestrate more and more of these events (or let them happen as happened at Uvalde) because the last thing they want is an armed resistance rising up and casting them out of their positions of influence and having a Nuremberg Trial 2.0 where Trudeau, Newsom, Fauci, Gates et al are found guilty of genocide and Crimes Against Humanity and promptly publicly hanged.
DANGER: "ANTI-VACCINE" THOUGHTS ARE A MENTAL ILLNESS REQUIRING "TREATMENT"
Powerful video, at the end Hansen states that they are not done yet, that they will declare a new "Lockdown" soon (Lockdown etymology: the penal system, how fitting now that we have a Prison Planet).
Yes, I've stated the same thing, that they absolutely are not done yet, that they absolutely will announce a new variant soon (and that this will not be a new variant, as you need an original virus to have a variant, this will be the near-term death wave among the elderly who've taken the 4th, 5th and soon 6th "vaccine")
The table is set, they've recently announced that "for the next Pandemic why don't we, through the WHO, introduce a universal digital certificate / Vaccine Passport so that we don't need to lock down everyone, just the unvaccinated who refuse to take our injections" at their recent World Government Summit (but don't call it that, that's what "Conspiracy Theorists" have been saying for decades!") in Bali, with attendees from G20 member states and Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates wouldn't you know it, who aren't actually leaders of any G20 member state but actually control them all and it's so blatantly in your face that you have to be a literal mental retard to not understand this.
Now they just need wait for the death-wave among the quadruple and quintuple jabbed elderly who have had their immune systems destroyed in a manner that resembles HIV AIDS (VAIDS) and wouldn't you know it, we are entering seasonal flu season. Hospitals will be overrun, or they will, as they did the first time, using sufficient theatrics, with their control of the media, create the appearance of hospitals being overrun, they will diagnose those over 70 with a new variant using the PCR test who are also diabetic, obese, and have heart disease (the actual IFR for "COVID" Alpha strain has been revised downward recently to .035% under the age of 69 and .095% over 69 because 95% of the so called "COVID" deaths the patients had an additional 2.6 comorbidities and were actually dying from the co-morbidites like they do a like amount from seasonal flu every year. PCR test can't distinguish between SARS-COV-2 which remains to be isolated and seasonal flu. Cause of death: "COVID-19"). I'm predicting, at minimum 25-50% IFR among the quadruple and quintuple jabbed elderly, particularly those with any co-morbidities, especially the trifecta of obesity, diabetes and heart disease.
They will spin this, tell the masses it's Variant X, and it's because we never attained herd immunity because of "vaccine" hesitancy, Martial Law will be declared (the movie Contagion is Predictive Programming, this is how this "deadly pandemic" will go down) and, for everyone's safety, physical currency will be abolished and replaced with CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) based cryptocurrency. The economy, already a walking corpse, will be dealt it's final blow. Due to the Humanitarian crisis that will ensue, to include a massive crime-wave, Martial Law will be declared, the National Guard will be deployed, and they will introduce a UBI that one can only attain if they attain a Digital Vaccine Certificate as the UBI payment system will work through that.
They will simultaneously roll out a Social Credit Score. There will be a "cyber-attack" on the power-grid and internet from "Russian hackers". That's the entire reason Putin, (a WEF Young Global Leader and close personal friend of Henry Kissinger, Kissinger who likened elderly Social Security recipients as "Useless Eaters", who is Klaus Schwab's mentor) who could have invaded Ukraine to put an end to the wanton artillery strikes in the Donbass region there since 2008, he just up and decides at random to do this right as the FDA is ordered via Court Ruling to release Pfizer's safety trial data now, and not 75 years from now as they requested, and revelations that Moderna patented "SARS-COV-2" in 2016 (the computerized gene sequence of said virus, which does not actually exist and remains to be isolated) via discovery that a gene sequence that pertains to said virus was found in the patent repository by Frontiers in Virology with 1 in 3 Trillion odds that this particular sequence that only pertains to SARS-COV-2 could be a coincidence. His timely invasion both distracts the masses, i.e. Wag the Dog starring Robert Deniro, and provides sufficient pre-text to the big cyber-attack that Klaus Schwab has been telegraphing via his annual Cyber Polygon exercises (just like Event 201, hosted by Schwab and Gates 2 months before the start of the "Pandemic")
I lay all of this out in my vlog from 8 months ago here if you're interested:
Back to Hansen's message at the end of his video, where he states they are not done yet, that more viruses and "Lockdowns" are coming. I stated that a few weeks ago here at the top of the following blog post. I've included the post in it's entirety because it's relevant to the recent G20 World Government Summit where it was suggested that "for the next Pandemic" (isn't it interesting how they just know that there will be another one soon?) that, through the WHO, they introduce a "Vaccine" Passport + CBDC UBI + Social Credit Score so that they "don't need to lock everyone down, just those who refuse to comply".
And remember, even if you received 1, 2 or 3 of these "vaccines" either through coercion or because you didn't know any better, (I know a 30 year old Yoga instructor who was injured after the 2nd shot and doesn't want any more), and are adamant about not taking any more, well now you can't go to the grocery store without getting shot's 3, 4, 5 and 6 and 7 and 8 next year, however many you may need to help Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Larry Fink, the Rockefellers and the rest of the merry band of .01% economic elite to include Zuckerberg, Musk, Bezos, the Clintons, and any politician like Gavin Newsom, Justin Trudeau and Joe Biden and anyone from Hollywood who ever took Lolita Express address the human overpopulation problem.
Those Behind the Fake Pandemic Will Attempt to Complete their Transhumanist Depopulation Great Reset Agenda with their Control of the WHO
They absolutely are not done with their agenda, they absolutely are not backing down, they absolutely will announce more variants (that wouldn't you know it are indistinguishable from seasonal flu using the PCR test with a 95% false positive rate and are actually caused by the injections that have destroyed the immune systems, done irreparable DNA damage, heart and brain damage. Now they are saying all of this is from "COVID". This is why their desperation reached a fever pitch, i.e. threats of job loss, ostracization from society, "Spin For the Vaxx", because they so desperately did NOT want 30% of the population to refuse these injections and exist as a control group because the data would show, very quickly, that only the "vaccinated" are having all of these problems), they absolutely 100% will attempt to lock us all down again, possibly in the next few weeks as their Kabuki Theater War / Wag The Dog 2 starring the Oscar Award winning actor Zelensky is failing spectacularly. Look on social media, no-one has the "I stand with Ukraine" flag anymore. No-one has the "I got my COVID-19 Vaccine - We Can Do This" banner anymore. So now, as the old saying goes, "The Emperor has no clothes", now that chicanery and deception has failed they move on to top down totalitarian control through a global political body and that body is the WHO:
IG Farben created Zyklon B, the toxic nerve gas used in the gas chambers at Auschwitz.
Bill Gates' father was a renowned eugenicist, a signatory of the Eugenics Society, who created planned parenthood to reduce the number of African Americans in large urban areas.
Bill Gates and the Rockfeller's likely built the Georgia Guidestones.
This cabal has reverse engineered ET technology at their disposal, we absolutely do not need to use carbon based energy. Releasing this technology would spell the end of their Oil Empire scarcity economics gravy train. They would rather kill off 80-90% of the global human population than release technology that would transform human civilization literally overnight.
Their Transhumanist agenda will never succeed because the brain does not produce consciousness, it merely facilitates it, and therefore can never, ever, be transferred to silicon "E-Machines" (Ray Kurzweil) Consciousness is non-local, can never be destroyed. We are eternal beings having a human experience.
Their plan is doomed to fail. Question is, how many of us will they take out on the way down?
United Nations and its World Health Organization (WHO) share a history of corruption and control by Rockefeller Syndicate/Pharma interests and The Order of Skull & Bones.
“Although the Rockefellers preferred not to be openly identified with the UN, they overtly dominated every move of its founding.” 1:403
“The Rockefeller Foundation (RF), the unparalleled 20th century health philanthropy heavyweight, both profoundly shaped WHO and maintained long and complex relations with it, even as both institutions changed over time.”
”On Oct. 24, 1949, four years after the charter went into effect, the cornerstone was laid for the U.N. headquarters building near the East River in mid-Manhattan. Nelson Rockefeller arranged for the purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate in Westchester County was rejected as being too far from New York City. The $83.4 million purchase — as adjusted to reflect current dollars — was funded by Nelson Rockefeller’s father, John D. Rockefeller Jr., who donated the land to the city.” 2
”In 1977, the Declaration of Alma Ata gave to the World Health Organization (WHO) the means to extend the Flexner Report not only in North America, but throughout the entire world... Control of health, therefore, was transferred from national governments to a world government. A world government that is non-elected. And of which its "Surgeon General" in charge of health is the WHO.” 3:37
”But who actually controls that the WHO? That is the question. And also the answer. The United Nations (UN), the political arm of world financiers, that includes those who backed the Flexner Report and its application. More and more subtly, the medical and political authorities are robbing us of what is ours, as well as our rights. They establish the rules and make the laws that exploit us. It is a regime of medical terror. It is a world monopoly.”
”The Rockefeller American Century
In 1939, along with his four brothers–Nelson, John D. III, Laurance and Winthrop–David Rockefeller and their Rockefeller Foundation financed the top secret War & Peace Studies at the New York Council on Foreign Relations, the most influential private US foreign policy think-tank which also was controlled by the Rockefellers. A collection of American academics gathered even before outbreak of World War II to plan a postwar world empire, what Time-Life insider Henry Luce later called The American Century. They made a blueprint for taking over a global empire from the bankrupt British, but carefully decided to call it not an empire. Rather they called it “spreading democracy, freedom, the American way of free enterprise.” 4
Their project looked at the geopolitical map of the world and planned how the USA would replace the British Empire as de facto the dominant empire. The creation of the United Nations was a key part. The Rockefeller brothers donated the land in Manhattan for the UN Headquarters (and in the process made billions in the increased prices of the adjoining real estate that they also owned). This is the Rockefeller “philanthropy” method. Every grant donated is calculated to increase family wealth and power.
After the War David Rockefeller dominated US foreign policy and the countless wars in Africa, Latin America, Asia. The Rockefeller faction created the Cold War against the Soviet Union, and NATO in order to keep a reviving Western Europe under American vassal status. How they did so I documented in detail in my book, The Gods of Money. Here I consider several examples of David Rockefeller’s crimes against humanity.”
Rockefeller Biology Research: ‘Control the people…’
If philanthropy should be motivated by love of our fellow man, the grants of the Rockefeller Foundation are not. Take medical research. During the period until 1939 and the War, the Rockefeller Foundation financed biological research at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin. It was Nazi eugenics—how to breed a superior race and how to kill off or sterilize those they deemed “inferior.” Rockefeller financed Nazi eugenics. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil also violated US law to secretly supply the Nazi Air Force with scarce fuel during the War. After the War the Rockefeller brothers arranged for leading Nazi scientists involved in ghastly human experiments to be brought to the USA and Canada under sanitized identities to continue their eugenics research. Many worked in the CIA top secret MK-Ultra project.
In the 1950’s the Rockefeller brothers founded the Population Council to advance eugenics, disguised as population research into birth control. The Rockefeller brothers were responsible in the 1970’s for a US Government Top Secret project directed by Rockefeller National Security Adviser Kissinger, NSSM-200 titled, “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests.” It argued high population growth in developing nations with strategic raw materials like oil or minerals were a US “national security threat” as more population demands national economic growth, using those resources internally (sic!).NSSM-200 made developing world population reduction programs a precondition of US aid. In the 1970s David Rockefeller’s Rockefeller Foundation also financed together with WHO development of a special tetanus vaccine that limited population by making a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, literally going after the human reproductive process itself.”
2010: (Paul Flynn) “…claimed that the decision by WHO, a body of the United Nations, to declare a pandemic had been influenced by pharmaceutical companies.” https://www.bbc.com/news/10396382
“In 2010, the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism published findings of their investigation into the financial ties between drug companies and the WHO in the context of the 2009 influenza “pandemic”. The article revealed that some of the experts advising WHO had declarable financial ties with drug companies that were producing antivirals and influenza vaccines.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Godlee-2010-Conflicts-of-interest-and-pandemic-flu.pdf
”AIDS and SARS are ways for epidemiologists (e.g., the CDC, WHO, etc.) to secure their jobs and continued funding for their agencies. No new emerging epidemics, maybe no CDC, no WHO, so we've got an infrastructure that REQUIRES the "discovery" of new, threatening epidemics. And the media pick a new one every year. This year, it's SARS. For the past couple of years, it's been West Nile Virus. Next year it'll be something else.”
-Dr. Daniel H. Duffy, Sr.
“Is the WHO sick? The filmmaker and mother Lilian Franck reveals clandestine influences by the tobacco, pharmaceutical and nuclear industries on the organization. She shows a frightening portrayal of our present society, in which governmental politics is becoming obsolete.”
”The pharmaceutical industry enforces policy discipline through agency budgets. The World Health Organization (WHO) gets roughly half its budget from private sources, including Pharma and its allied foundations.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/cdc-who/
“This phenomenon of The Order as the FIRST on the scene is found especially among foundations, although it appears that The Order keeps a continuing presence among Foundation Trustees. It does more than just be FIRST where money is concerned. It stays around to keep an eye on expenditures. The FIRST President of the Carnegie Institution (1902-5) was Daniel Coit Gilman, but other members of The Order have been on Carnegie boards since the turn of the century. Gilman was on the scene for the founding of the Peabody, Slater, and Russell Sage Foundations. McGeorge Bundy was President of the Ford Foundation from 1966-1979. 5
The FIRST Chairman of an influential but almost unknown organization established in 1910 was also a member of The Order. In 1920 Theodore Marburg founded the American Society for the Judicial Settlement of International Disputes, but Marburg was only President. The FIRST Chairman was member William Howard Taft ('78). The Society was the forerunner of the League to Enforce the Peace, which developed into the League of Nations concept and ultimately into the United Nations.
In United Nations we find, for example, that Archibald McLeash ('15) was the brains behind the constitution of the UNESCO organization.”
“THE NECESSITY FOR A NEW DIALECTIC PROCESS
World War II was the culmination of the dialectic process created in the 1920s and 1930s. The clash between "left" and "right," i.e., the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, led to creation of a synthesis -- notably the United Nations, and a start towards regional groupings in -- i.e. Common Market, COMECON, NATO, UNESCO, Warsaw Pact, SEATO, CENTO, and then the Trilateral Commission. A start towards New World Order.
World War II left The Order with the necessity to create a new dialectical situation to promote more conflict to achieve a higher level synthesis.”
“THE ORDER BUILDS A NEW DIALECTIC ARM IN CHINA
Just as we found the Bush family involved with the early development of the Soviet Union, then with financing the Nazis, and vaguely behind the scenes in Angola, so we find a Bush active in construction of the new dialectic arm: Communist China.
In 1971 Mr. Nixon appointed George "Poppy" Bush (The Order 1948) as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, irrespective of the fact that Bush had no previous experience in diplomacy. As chief U.S. delegate, Bush had responsibility for defense against the Communist Chinese attack on the Republic of China, an original free enterprise member of the United Nations. With the vast power of the United States at his disposal, Bush failed miserably: the Republic was expelled from United Nations and Communist China took its seat. Shortly after that fiasco, Bush left United Nations to take over as Chairman of the Republican National Committee.”
I need to issue a few corrections to information I relayed in my recent vlog. When attempting to explain how Japan didn't take Pfizer at their word in regards to Pharmacokinetic Biodistribution (where the vaccine goes in the body) I mistakenly refer to the Pharmacokinetic Biodistribution data as Reproductive Toxicology data. I feel the need to point out this distinction here because in actuality no Reproductive Toxicology studies were actually performed because the FDA allowed what is in actuality mRNA Gene Therapy Technology to simply be renamed and therefore classified as conventional vaccines no Reproductive Toxicology studies are required. Yes. That's how in your face ridiculously corrupt this entire fiasco is. This is like selling beer or wine to children by putting it in a soda can. "It's soda pop now".
Here, per Robert Malone's exchange with Reiner Fuellmich, this is actually a very big deal. Also, before going there, I made another error when I stated that the masks reduced "COVID" deaths by .031%, I was actually citing the percentage reduction in "COVID" deaths attributed to ALL so called public health measures: the shutting down of the global economy, schools to include places of worship, arbitrary 6 ft. social distancing and the completely useless masks. The CDC DID come out in early-to-mid 2021 and inform the public that the masks were completely useless, however, the masses, completely in the grip of Mass Formation Psychosis, insisted on continuing to wear them anyway. This figure was actually .2% on average. I'm still trying to determine where I got the .031% from as I'm pretty good at storing random information such as this.
I also want to point to an issue I have with a recent Expose' article I shared here (and received a 30 day ban on Facebook for trying to share it there), indicating that we are seeing evidence for VAIDS among the "vaccinated". I was fast and loose with this one and did not properly vet this article before sharing it here. There is nothing that is infactual or unscientific in the article per se, but it is really misleading in that the data that is being referred to is the Relative Risk Reduction value, a meaningless metric literally invented by Big Pharma to overstate a drug's efficaciousness.
Relative Risk works like this: say a drug test is comprised of an intervention and a placebo / control group with a 100 participants in each group, at the end of some pre-designated trial duration the number of patients in each group that exhibit a drug's effectiveness, in this case, a negative PCR test result, are tallied and compared between each group. If you have 2 people in the placebo / control group test positive and only 1 in the intervention group, because 2 is twice as many as 1 this works out to a Relative Risk Reduction value of 50% (because 1 is 50% of 2)!
They can literally then come out and say "drug / vaccine X is 95%" effective which they did!
Per Pfizer's trial data:
Placebo Group: 17,511
Control / Vaccinated Group: 17,411
Number of positive cased at end of 9 week trial:
Placebo: 162
Control: 8
They divide 8 into 162 and come up with 95% effective which they then relay as factual data to the public who does not know any better!
The Absolute Risk Reduction value, the real effectiveness (again, dubious trial to begin with as participants in the vaccinated group were kicked out of the trial between the 1st and 2nd shot, see how the placebo group is larger at the end) is derived by dividing 8 into 17k (.92%) and 162 into 17k (.04%) then subtracting one quotient into the other, in this case .92% - .04% = .88% ARR. And this ARR value only represents a reduction of severity of symptoms! They were never proven to prevent transmission nor infection!
I refer to the work of Dr. Darren Schmidt who demonstrates the math they used to derive the so called 95% effectiveness they relayed to the public:
The Expose' article I shared here is using the Relative Risk Reduction value! These "vaccines" do not confer a reduction of severity of symptoms of 50% in the 30-39 age cohort! I think that the author of this article at the Expose' is trying to beat pharma by playing their own game with number and math manipulation but this is honestly not a good tactic because the implicit message here is that there is any benefit to speak of whatsoever by taking these injections.
.84% Absolute Risk Reduction, which is reduction of severity of symptoms, is all that is demonstrated in Pfizer's trial, per their own data, and I encourage anyone who is incredulous to please, by all means, do your own research. They don't prevent infection nor transmission and never did. THEY LIED to you when they told you otherwise. The data didn't "evolve" in the interim.
The Expose' kind of explain that this is Relative Risk but they don't outright state it explicitly. I don't know why they are doing this, we have ample signal from VAERS, V-SAFE and DMED databases indicating that over 90% of those hospitalized with "COVID" are triple, quadruple and quintuple injected (diagnosed "COVID" positive using the PCR test, they don't have "COVID", which remains to be isolated, they are suffering from exposure to the bio-weapon, whose symptoms, spike protein derived endothelial dysfunction, just so happen to look like "COVID". Also, when you die from the bio-weapon, when PCR test says "COVID", your death wasn't "vaccine" related, it's the new variant, and we will need to Lockdown and introduce a "Vaccine" Passport + CBDC based UBI + Social Credit System to ensure compliance).
The formula used to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to demonstrate that their vaccine had an alleged effectiveness of 95%.U = No. of Cases among the unvaccinated V = No. of Cases among the fully vaccinated U – V / U = Vaccine Effectiveness
Now, the distinction between a Gene Therapy Technology product and a conventional vaccine and why this is important when it comes to testing and safety:
Bayer Exec Brags mRNA Shots Are ‘Gene Therapy’ Marketed as ‘Vaccines’
Originally posted 7 March 2022. The statement by Peter Daszak in the latter half is absolutely bone chilling. I've underlined it so it can be found easier.
Fun fact: Bayer was originally IG Farben, you know, the German chemical giant who created Zyklon B, the gas they used in the Jewish Death Camps? And then guess who buys Monsanto? That's right, Bayer. Nothing to see here folks, there absolutely no connection with all of this and depopulation.
Please do note that I've been referring to these "vaccines" as Gene Therapy Technology since early 2020.
Like this one (thank god there is a search function) where I transcribed, word for word, the entirety of Dr. Robert Malone's exchange with Reiner Fuellmich where Dr. Malone points out the importance of the distinction between novel Gene Therapy Technology and a conventional vaccine as GTP is bound by more regulation requiring reproductive toxicology studies whereas conventional vaccines do not require such studies and this is why this GTP "vaccines" were categorized as conventional vaccines because they had done the studies on GTP in the past, with Ferrets in 2004 and non-human primates in 2012 and every animal study all of the specimens, 100%, died from Antibody Dependent Enhancement. The person at the FDA who made the decision to skip Human trials was, drum roll please.........................Anthony Fauci's wife, Christine Grady, who heads up the FDA dept. Human Testing and Ethics. You literally cannot make this up: https://www.facebook.com/hp.pervinkler/posts/383525169828309
DR. ROBERT MALONE INTERVIEWED BY DR. REINER FUELLMICH | GERMAN CORONA INVESTIGATIVE
Highlights (please go into this keeping in the back of your mind the equally plausible hypothesis that there is no novel coronavirus. Dr. Malone is still in the industry, he's still a consultant, and he strays heavily from conspiracy theorizing, he's extremely reserved. Nevertheless, he still confirms that an intentional release is not out of the realm of plausibility here)
First ~10 minutes: introduction and establishment of Malone's bonafides as the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology in question. Necessary viewing if youre unfamiliar with Dr. Malone. 10-15 minutes: are Reiner Fuellmich's Deutch translation of Malone's introduction.
24-29 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg presents the question of origin, intentional release is not ruled out by Malone. They also touch on regulatory capture of the regulatory agencies, the FDA and the legislature.
29 min mark: this is where it gets good, Malone confirms for all that the Moderna "vaccine" is the NIH vaccine and was funded by DARPA, the contract between NIH and Moderna were signed in December 2019 to develop the "vaccine" (bear in mind, first reported cases of SARS-COV-2 were a cluster of cases in Wubei Province in China in early January 2020. Also, bear in mind the proximity of Event 201 on the 18th of Oct, 2019, the tabletop training exercise hosted by The Bill Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab) simulating a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus.
Malone goes on to characterize the situation of regulatory capture as "The idea that the State is separate from Industry in the United States is no longer tenable, and I think this is an example that the German intellectuals are very aware of"
Fascism definition: The merger of state and corporate power. Another lengthy translation into Deutche follows until the 34 min mark.
34 min mark: their PCR test expert presents question to Malone about cost benefit analysis, to include less expensive vaccines on offer in India in regards to cost, safety and efficacy.
Malone feels the need to place utmost emphasis on regulatory capture before going forward with this question. He mentions how the royalty payments from Moderna go into the salaries of 6 NIH employees working under Anthony Fauci.
36 min mark: Malone discloses conflict of interest as a consultant with an Indian pharmaceutical company, Reliance.
42 min mark: Wolfgan Wodarg asks Malone about the previous mRNA animal trials in 2005 and about ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). Malone confirms the continued, repeated phenomenon of ADE in the trials. Malone goes on to say:
"That's why when I made a threat assessment after I was contacted by a US officer who was in Wuhan in the latter part of 2019 who gave me a phone call in the first week of 2020 and warned me I needed to get my team spun up I made a threat assessment and recommended repurposed drugs (Ivermectin) specifically because of the ADE history of (mRNA) coronavirus vaccine development."
~44 min mark, He then goes on to say:
"the clinical studies were not designed to detect ADE and that the phase 2, 3 studies were performed were not structured in a way that they would detect ADE should it happen" ~45 min mark He then says that "the variants that are emerging are not showing a marked increase in anything that can be interpreted as an ADE result." Bear in mind here, this exchange took place on the 9th of July and we have a more recent statement from Dr. Malone from two weeks ago where he does say that the variants seem to be the result of ADE and that "we are witnessing a worse case scenario in regards to ADE" (see previous recent post here)
Here's the best part of this exchange.
At the 48 min mark he gets to the root of the problem. The problem stems from the regulatory capture of the agencies (FDA and CDC) and the existing rules that allow the drug manufacturer to do their own safety studies. One particular consequence is the intentional categorization of these vaccines as conventional vaccines because then the regulatory safety is only concerned with the sterility of the injection device (the needle and vaccine) and the purity of what's in the vaccine itself NOT the behavior of the contents in the vaccine. He elaborates on this at the 50 min mark. So the safety studies were only concerned with established safety guidelines AROUND CONVENTIONAL VACCINES. If these were categorized as GENE THERAPY TECHNOLOGY which is what they actually are, then the safety studies would be concerned with the behavior of the technology, the mRNA lipid nanoparticles, where they travel in the body, and what consequences stem from that.
~50 min mark 51 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg adds to this, stating that in Germany they changed the definition of vaccines in 2009 to encompass Gene Therapy Technology. He surmises in anticipation of the need for this in the future, i.e., the roll out of a Fake Pandemic in 2020.
Malone responds with:
"The consequence of this decision, is that the regulators have treated the gene therapy products as traditional vaccines and they required, if you understand pharmaceuticals, they require rigorous characterization of the quantity, purity etc. of the material in the needle, but if you think this through, the active agent is the expressed protein antigen, and normally one would characterize with for a traditional vaccine exactly how much of that expressed protein is produced, where it goes, and for how long. In these cases the regulators have not done that, so we have no indication of the levels of spike produced, the distribution of spike produced and the duration of spike produced."
Wodarg: "We don't know the target"
Malone: "Well just so, we don't know the cells that they are infecting or transfecting....What we do know is that the adenovirus vector were designed for prolonged protein expression, the mRNA logic is that it enables shorter term drug like activity and then the RNA is degraded, but we don't know what the kinetcs are (pharmacokinetics). So the regulators have, in many ways to my eyes, in looking at, for instance, the Japanese technical document (Japan's independent Pfizer BioNtech vaccine research) have been designed to give the right answer, the answer desired by the pharmaceutical companies, not the scientifically rigorous answer. The only explanation I can come up with is that the regulators didn't have sufficient background to comprehend the data they were shown and it's deficiencies. I wanted to make this key point, we do not understand how much protein is being made by any of these genetic vaccine technologies, where it's being made and for how long it's being made, and I believe that's a major oversight."
Fuellmich then states that "contrary to what these vaccine makers have told us, it doesn't stay at the injection site but moves anywhere in the body?"
Malone confirms and adds:
"In the case of Pfizer, they characterize the pharmaco-distribution, of the active drug material and the expression of the trans-gene, the encoded RNA, not using the final drug product but rather a surrogate, this is red flag number 1, that's not usually allowed, and they characterize the expression of spike in the animal models, they characterized the expression of luciferase, luciferase is the protein that makes the firefly tail glow.....so it's very sensitive reportaging because it's photons and we have photon cameras. Normally, the way the data is characterized is you dissect the animal and light the cells in each sample and then you can precisely calculate the amount of protein but we aren't even talking about spike protein but luciferase...there is a parlor trick that can be done with luciferase where you image the whole animal, you inject the luciferase and you can see the photons through the whole animal, however, you can appreciate that these photons get scattered as they are obstructed by bones and muscle tissue and you end up with a biased image that only shows the most expression. It's the least sensitive method. Based on that Pfizer asserts that the expression is localized just to the site of injection yet that's the method Pfizer used for their dossier, a highly biased assay, and this illustrates my point, I think that the regulatory authorities were not sufficiently technically expert, to comprehend, we have an expression in the states "pulling the wool over your eyes", to comprehend that Pfizer had selected the least sensitive method to characterize the distribution of a surrogate protein rather than the actual drug product."
60 min mark: "This feeds back into a point of a checklist used by regulators, with traditional vaccines genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity are not required, with a gene therapy product they absolutely are required. In this case, by Pfizer's own admission in their protocol, the reproductive toxicology studies were not done rigorously and there were no geno-toxicity studies done. So we have, to be technically accurate, we have evidence of non-good laboratory practice studies of concentration of synthetic lipids into ovarian tissue, and spleen and bone marrow and other places you might expect them to distribute to but ovarian tissue is particularly concerning..."
63 min mark, concluding remarks:
Malone: "With all of this pressure from the governments, the press and the media, we are unable to meet the fundamentals of medical ethics that go back to the Nuremburg trials and those are, there must be complete disclosure of risk, those risks must be comprehended, and there has to be free willingness to accept the product, it cannot be coerced or enticed. Those are bedrock principles and these are currently experimental products and for some reason governments around the world have decided they can jettison these fundamental ethics and hastily implement these vaccines and do it in a universal way...and there's been this push to apply the aggregated risk that is almost completely concentrated among the elderly and obese to the entire population and using this to justify vaccinating the entire population with the logic that this will enable herd immunity, but it won't enable herd immunity because the vaccines aren't sterilizing for the virus and the whole logic, when you examine the underlying logic of what is being promoted and this is what gives rise to the conspiracy theories because clearly this logic we've applied to vaccine development for decades is not being followed"
Supporting information:
Japan's Pfize BioNtech vaccine Pharmacokinetic Test (see page 7 for concentration of mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries):
In case you missed it. This is absolutely must watch. There is so much information relayed here that I literally just listened to this like 4-5 times over the past few days whilst cooking etc.
Synopsis + Highlights:
Intro to ~5 min: there is no novel coronavirus.
~5-11 min: We made SARS in 2003 by attempting to manufacture an HIV vaccine. US Patent 7279327 (10 min mark)
~11-23 min: SARS Coronavirus not novel, the CDC attempted to patent both the virus itself and testing of it in 2003 and the patent office rejected the application because the gene sequence of the virus was already in the patent repository (99.99% similar). The CDC over-rode the decision, paid a fee, and patented SARS on the 28th of July 2003. Only three days after securing the patent, Sequioa Pharmaceuticals submitted a patent application for the treatment of this very same virus indicating insider information. Sequoia was later subsumed into Pfizer.
~23-29 min: This is where it gets really good. If youre not sitting on the edge of your seat by now you will be after this. Remember how the Gain of Function research that was outlawed here in the U.S. in 2014-2015 was simply continued at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with full funding, purview and guidance of Anthony Fauci @ NIH / NIAID (who owns half the Moderna mRNA non-vaccine patent) through Peter Daszak @ EcoHealth Alliance? Listen to this quote of Peter Daszak in 2015: (29 min mark)
"We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a Pan Coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process" - Peter Daszak, National Academy of Press Publication, Feb 2, 2015.
~29 on: There is no novel coronavirus. SARS-COV-2 doesn't exist. There are no variants. This is a factual statement given the fact that SARS-COV-2 hasn't even been isolated. I've always considered this possibility.
31 mark: "There was no lab leak, this was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to get them addicted to a pan coronavirus vaccine this has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released and every study every launched to try to identify a lab leak is a red herring"- Dr. David E. Martin
This corroborates what David Icke was saying (video can be found in a previous post) that there will always be a variant because they have not actually isolated SARS-COV-2.
The fact that the only vaccines that exist for SARS-COV-2 are using mRNA LNP (lipid nano particle) that instruct cells to produce spike proteins, not actually weakened / attenuated viruses as would be used in a conventional vaccine also further strengthens this argument. There is no conventional vaccine for SARS-COV-2 because to make one conventionally you would first need to have an isolated virus to attenuate.
I believe this is the most likely hypothesis for our current situation in regards to the "Pandemic". There is no virus. People are dying from seasonal flu as they do every year and the PCR test at 45-50 amplification cycles can't actually distinguish between COVID 19 and COVID 18, 17,16, 15, 14 or all of the other members of the Coronavirus family.
I highly recommend continuing to listen all the way to the end. ~35 min mark: "The New Normal", language that became the branding campaign adopted by the WHO with influence of both Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci.
Beyond 35 min: Seasonal influenza vaccine industry was not successful and Big Pharma desperately needed an emergency to mandate mass vaccination.
~49-52 min: "The tragedy is that we are now sitting in a world where we have hundreds of millions of people who are being injected with a pathogen stimulating computer sequence which is being sold under what the patent office, what the medical profession and what the FDA in it's own clinical standards would not suggest is a vaccine but by using the term we are actually are now subjecting hundreds of millions of people to what was known to be by 2005 a biological weapon." - Dr. David E. Martin
Pertinent conclusions:
There is no novel coronavirus. There is no variant. There is no pandemic. The "vaccines" are not vaccines.
(Natural News) It has finally been revealed – and we knew this all along – that Covid-19 lockdowns, mask mandates and other associated plandemic tyranny was a “test” to determine whether or not the world is ready for a new globalist system of “social credit score” control.
It turns out that billions of people passed that test, according to Mridul Kaushik, who wrote an article called “My Carbon: An approach for inclusive and sustainable cities” that discusses the next phase of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) global takeover.
“Covid-19 was the test of social responsibility,” Kaushik admits in the piece.
Kaushik, by the way, is the WEF’s “Mission Director” for “Smart Cities Mission.” His bio says he is part of the WEF’s Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs of India. (Related: The WEF wants all global slaves to drink recycled sewage to prevent global warming.)
Will you comply with the WEF’s new world order?
According to Kaushik, billions of people complied with exactly the types of things that the WEF hoped they would. They covered their faces with cloth covid veils, for instance, even though doing so does not prevent disease and actually causes more of it.
Billions of people also obediently avoided other human beings like the plague, aka social distancing, which served no purpose other than to break down social cohesion even further while instilling fear in the most gullible.
Then we have the mass “vaccination” scheme that was unleashed via Operation Warp Speed, as well as contact tracing and hospital remdesivir-plus-ventilator protocol, which helped to thin the herd through depopulation.
“There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility,” Kaushik writes.
All of this is now being extrapolated into the WEF’s “climate change” protocols for creating a new sustainable world. This will include “personal carbon allowance programs,” meaning people will soon be restricted in every aspect of their lives based on the fictitious notion of a “carbon footprint.”
If the WEF is successful in its mission to reset and transform the world, then humanity of the future will only be allowed to do certain things at certain times and in limited quantities. Freedom will become a thing of the past.
Humans will be told to no longer eat meat, or to only drive their car so many miles in a day. Drawn to its logical end, there could also be a cap on the number of breaths a person takes because all that carbon dioxide is melting the polar ice caps, we are told.
“They justify surveillance state, relay covid with blame on people and pseudo deductions like climate to produce political economical [sic] turmoil and take over,” wrote someone on Twitter about the WEF’s game plan moving forward.
Unless enough people woke up throughout the plandemic and realized the scam, the WEF’s plan for the future will likely succeed. Billions of people who dutifully wore a mask and got every injection and booster pushed by the government will voluntarily allow themselves to be herded into this new paradigm.
In addition to social credit score-style emissions restrictions, the WEF wants everyone to live in a “smart home,” meaning a home that is controlled externally by third parties that regulate electricity and water usage.
Such rationing will provide “individual advisories on lower carbon and ethical choices for consumption of product and services,” Kaushik says.
As the world approaches the transition point of a great reset, we will keep you informed about the latest at GreatReset.news.
Wow. This is some of Amazing Polly's best research. I can assure you that if we do not put a halt to this that I and many others will most definitely wind up being diagnosed with "Sluggish Schizophrenia" for simply questioning "COVID" or the need for mandatory "vaccination". This is absolutely must watch.
"Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it" - George Santayana
Facebook has confirmed that five months’ worth of official Government data does in fact prove Covid-19 vaccination destroys the immune system leading to what can be described as a new form of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.
Back in August 2022, The Expose published an exclusive in-depth investigation into five months’ worth of official UK Government released by the UK Health Security Agency that confirmed each Covid-19 “booster” dose provides a very short-lived temporary boost to the immune systems of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune systems much more rapidly than had already been seen in people who had received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.
In short, we discovered that official UK Government data strongly suggests that the Covid-19 vaccinated population are developing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine-induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
That investigation was shared by a reader on Facebook on the same day that we published the article, and Facebook took it upon themselves to immediately remove the post and label it as “misinformation”.
However, the reader who shared our article disputed Facebook’s censorship and on the 27th October they finally responded to confirm that they were in fact wrong, the investigation was entirely correct, and that the readers Facebook post is now back on the highly censored social media platform.
So now that Facebook has confirmed what The Expose has been trying to tell the wider public for over a year, we have included the full original investigation below so that you can share this article far and wide.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) used to publish a weekly Vaccine Surveillance Report, with each report containing four weeks worth of data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status. For our investigation we analysed 5 of these published Vaccine Surveillance Reports containing data from August 16th 2021 to January 2nd 2022, in order to get a clear picture of the effect the Covid-19 vaccines are having on the immune systems of the vaccinated population, and this is what we found…
The UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Reports used for our investigation can all be found here –
Pfizer claims that its Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of a simple calculation (full details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of infections confirmed amongst the vaccinated group and the not-vaccinated group during the earliest stages of the still ongoing clinical trials.
Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and the data, unfortunately, paints an extremely concerning picture.
The week 37 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 33 and week 36 of 2021 (August 16th to September 12th). Because the report tells us the Covid-19 case rates per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated and two-dose vaccinated population we are able to calculate the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period, and it proved to be as follows – Source
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the under 18 age group between August 16th and September 12th 2021. The only other age groups that the vaccine was showing to have a positive effect at this point were 18-29, 30-39, and 80+. But as you can clearly see none of the age groups was showing a vaccine effectiveness anywhere near 95%.
However, just look at how the tables turn just one month later.
The week 41 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 37 and week 40 of 2021 (September 13th to October 10th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the under 18 age group between September 13th and October 10th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was 18-29.
What’s concerning here though is how far the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine has fallen in all age groups, but especially the 40-49 age group which fell from a real-world effectiveness of minus-36% to minus-109%.
The fact that the real-world effectiveness of the vaccines had surpassed the minus-100% barrier suggests that not only were the vaccines failing, but they were also completely decimating the immune system of the recipients.
This makes the next Vaccine Surveillance report frightening reading.
The week 45 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 (October 11th to November 7th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows – –
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-126% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +78% in the under 18 age group between October 11th to November 7th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have a positive effect at this point was again 18-29.
What’s concerning here is that two more age groups have surpassed the minus-100% barrier, with the 50-59 age group falling to minus-116% and the 60-69 age group falling to minus-120%. But what is perhaps more concerning is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections has continued to decline in the 40-49 age group after already surpassing the minus-100% barrier in the previous month.
What we can also see from the above is that the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injection in persons over the age of 80 has climbed from minus-22% to minus-9 percent. This coincides with the booster jab roll-out to this age group, suggesting the vaccines do in fact boost the immune system But it is worth noting that there is still a negative effectiveness in this age group, and it is still lower than the minus-3% effectiveness seen between week 33 and week 36 of 2021.
The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report, however, provides a much clearer picture on the effect of the boosters on the vaccinated population in the short term.
The week 49 Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 45 and week 48 of 2021 (November 8th to December 5th), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period was proving to be as follows –
The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-120% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +80% in the under 18 age group between November 8th to December 5th 2021. The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections actually only decreased in the 18-29-year-olds and 30-39-year-olds during these four weeks.
People over the age of 70 were rewarded with a major boost to their immune systems over these four weeks, with vaccine effectiveness proving to be +27% in 70-79-year-olds between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-84% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.
Whilst vaccine effectiveness in people over the age of 80 increased to +47% between 8th Nov and 5th Dec 21, compared to minus-9% between 11th Oct and 7th Nov 21.
Everyone between the age of 40 and 69 was also rewarded with a boost to their immune system during this period, however not enough to show a positive vaccine effectiveness. This boost in vaccine effectiveness coincides with when the booster shots were administered to each age group as can be seen in the below graph taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 1 – 2022.
Based on vaccine effectiveness turning positive in everyone over the age of 70 following the booster shot after previously showing a negative effectiveness, we should expect to see much-improved vaccine effectiveness in 40-69-year-olds in the next published Vaccine Surveillance Report.
But unfortunately, this isn’t the case.
The week 1 – 2022- Vaccine Surveillance report included the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status between week 49 and week 52 of 2021 (December 6th to January 2nd), and the real-world vaccine effectiveness during this period proved to be as follows –
Real-world vaccine effectiveness dropped to the lowest levels yet across all age groups except for the over 70’s between December 6th and January 2nd, but the over 70’s still dropped into negative effectiveness.
The expected further boost to 40 to 69-year-olds did not materialise and instead, a huge tumble in vaccine effectiveness was recorded, dropping to -151% in 40-49-yer-olds.
Vaccine effectiveness also tumbled in the 30-39-year-old age group to minus-123%, despite the booster jab being administered to millions in week 49.
The following graph illustrates the increase/decrease in vaccine effectiveness by the month among each age group over a period of 5 months from 16th Aug 21 to 2nd Jan 22.
The first booster shots were administered in week 37 of 2021, and this graph illustrates clearly how they provided a boost in vaccine effectiveness in the following two months. But unfortunately, it also shows how short-lived this boost was with the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines falling to frightening levels between weeks 49 and 52. But what does a positive/negative vaccine effectiveness actually mean?
Vaccines work by simulating a viral attack and provoking the immune system into responding as if you have had the virus. They are supposed to train the immune system to the point where you develop natural immunity to the virus. Therefore, vaccine effectiveness is really a measure of the immune system performance induced by the vaccine.
A vaccine effectiveness of +50% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated. In other words, the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is 50% better at tackling Covid-19.
A vaccine effectiveness of 0% would mean that the fully vaccinated are 0% more protected against Covid-19 than the unvaccinated, meaning the vaccines are ineffective. In other words, the fully vaccinated have an immune system that is equal to that of the unvaccinated at tackling Covid-19.
Whilst a vaccine effectiveness of -50% would mean that the unvaccinated were 50% more protected against Covid-19 than the fully vaccinated, meaning the vaccines actually decimate the immune system.
Therefore with the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines proving to be negative in everyone over the age of 18 in England, this means double/triple vaccinated adults’ immune systems are being decimated. Immune System Performance
The formula used to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines was based on the exact calculation used by Pfizer to demonstrate that their vaccine had an alleged effectiveness of 95%.U = No. of Cases among the unvaccinated V = No. of Cases among the fully vaccinated U – V / U = Vaccine Effectiveness
However in order to calculate the immune system performance we need to perform a slightly different calculation that divides the answer to U – V by the largest of the number of cases among either the unvaccinated or fully vaccinated.
Therefore, the calculation for a positive immune system performance is –
U – V / U
Whilst the calculation for a negative immune system performance is –
U – V / V
The following table shows the monthly boost/decline in the immune systems of the vaccinated population compared to the natural immune systems of the unvaccinated population-
This shows that as of the 2nd January 2021 (Month 5), triple/double vaccinated 40-49-year-olds currently have the worst immune system performance at -60%. But they are closely followed by 30-39-year-olds at -58%, 18-29-year-olds and 50-59-year-olds at -55%, and 60-69-year-olds at -47%.
The following graph illustrates the overall immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –
What we can see from the above is that the immune system performance of adults aged between 18 and 59 has deteriorated to the worst levels yet since they were given the Covid-19 vaccine. Whilst the immune system performance of everyone over the age of 60 has deteriorated dramatically following receipt of the booster shot, but not yet to the level seen between week 37 and week 40.
The over 70’s have however seen the most dramatic fall in immune system performance between month 4 and month 5 alongside 18-29-year-olds.
The 55% boost to the immune systems of the over 80’s given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 1% better than it was in month 3 but still 54% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.
The 73% boost to the immune systems of the 70-79-year-olds given by the boosters between month 3 and month 4 has also all but deteriorated between month 4 and month 5. Their immune system is performing 10% better than it was in month 3 but still 63% worse than their unvaccinated counterparts.
The minor boost, however, given to the immune Systems of everyone between the age of 30 and 59 by the boosters between months 3 and 4 has been completely decimated by the following month, whilst 18-29-year-olds have seen a 60% decline in their immune system performance between months 4 and 5.
The following graph illustrates the boost/degradation in immune system performance among all age groups in England over the past 5 months –
The real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections wains significantly in a short amount of time, but unfortunately for the vaccinated population, rather than the immune system returning to the same state it was prior to vaccination, the immune system performance begins to rapidly decline, making it inferior to that of the unvaccinated.
Now the official UK Government data proves that a booster dose of the vaccine can give a short-term boost to the immune system of the vaccinated, but unfortunately, this same data shows that the immune system performance then begins to decline even faster than it was prior to the booster dose being given.
This data, therefore, suggests that the vaccinated population will now require an endless cycle of booster shots to boost their immune systems to a point where it does not fail but is inferior to that of the unvaccinated population.
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome is a condition that leads to the loss of immune cells and leaves individuals susceptible to other infections and the development of certain types of cancers. In other words, it completely decimates the immune system.
Therefore, could we be seeing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine-induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome?
