See:
Dr. Jessica Rose has estimated that in actuality over 650k people have died from the "vaccines" and at the time of making this estimation there were only roughly 25-30k deaths reported to VAERS and she said that this was a CONSERVATIVE estimate.
Here Jessica Rose posits an incredibly conservative underreporting factor of 41x. Multiply 41x by ~30k = 1.2M / 2 (to be doubly conservative) = 600k.
Remember, when you die from the "vaccine" but PCR test says you have "COVID" that is what goes on the death certificate and into the statistics.
In regards to how these "vaccines" were simply categorized as conventional vaccines, and how Pharma went so far as to alter the literature definition of a vaccine, this is important because Gene Therapy Technology products, which is what these shots absolutely are, are bound by stringent safety standards that require long term reproductive toxicology studies; by simply categorizing these shots as conventional vaccines they were able to skip these safety requirements:
From this post:
DR. ROBERT MALONE INTERVIEWED BY DR. REINER FUELLMICH | GERMAN CORONA INVESTIGATIVE
Full analysis!
Highlights (please go into this keeping in the back of your mind the equally plausible hypothesis that there is no novel coronavirus. Dr. Malone is still in the industry, he's still a consultant, and he strays heavily from conspiracy theorizing, he's extremely reserved. Nevertheless, he still confirms that an intentional release is not out of the realm of plausibility here)
First ~10 minutes: introduction and establishment of Malone's bonafides as the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology in question. Necessary viewing if youre unfamiliar with Dr. Malone.
10-15 minutes: are Reiner Fuellmich's Deutch translation of Malone's introduction.
24-29 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg presents the question of origin, intentional release is not ruled out by Malone. They also touch on regulatory capture of the regulatory agencies, the FDA and the legislature.
29 min mark: this is where it gets good, Malone confirms for all that the Moderna "vaccine" is the NIH vaccine and was funded by DARPA, the contract between NIH and Moderna were signed in December 2019 to develop the "vaccine" (bear in mind, first reported cases of SARS-COV-2 were a cluster of cases in Wubei Province in China in early January 2020. Also, bear in mind the proximity of Event 201 on the 18th of Oct, 2019, the tabletop training exercise hosted by The Bill Gates Foundation and the World Economic Forum (Klaus Schwab) simulating a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus.
Malone goes on to characterize the situation of regulatory capture as "The idea that the State is separate from Industry in the United States is no longer tenable, and I think this is an example that the German intellectuals are very aware of"
Fascism definition: The merger of state and corporate power.
Another lengthy translation into Deutche follows until the 34 min mark.
34 min mark: their PCR test expert presents question to Malone about cost benefit analysis, to include less expensive vaccines on offer in India in regards to cost, safety and efficacy.
Malone feels the need to place utmost emphasis on regulatory capture before going forward with this question. He mentions how the royalty payments from Moderna go into the salaries of 6 NIH employees working under Anthony Fauci.
36 min mark: Malone discloses conflict of interest as a consultant with an Indian pharmaceutical company, Reliance.
42 min mark: Wolfgan Wodarg asks Malone about the previous mRNA animal trials in 2005 and about ADE (Antibody Dependent Enhancement). Malone confirms the continued, repeated phenomenon of ADE in the trials. Malone goes on to say:
"That's why when I made a threat assessment after I was contacted by a US officer who was in Wuhan in the latter part of 2019 who gave me a phone call in the first week of 2020 and warned me I needed to get my team spun up I made a threat assessment and recommended repurposed drugs (Ivermectin) specifically because of the ADE history of (mRNA) coronavirus vaccine development."
~44 min mark, He then goes on to say:
"the clinical studies were not designed to detect ADE and that the phase 2, 3 studies were performed were not structured in a way that they would detect ADE should it happen" ~45 min mark
He then says that "the variants that are emerging are not showing a marked increase in anything that can be interpreted as an ADE result."
Bear in mind here, this exchange took place on the 9th of July and we have a more recent statement from Dr. Malone from two weeks ago where he does say that the variants seem to be the result of ADE and that "we are witnessing a worse case scenario in regards to ADE" (see previous recent post here)
Here's the best part of this exchange.
At the 48 min mark he gets to the root of the problem. The problem stems from the regulatory capture of the agencies (FDA and CDC) and the existing rules that allow the drug manufacturer to do their own safety studies. One particular consequence is the intentional categorization of these vaccines as conventional vaccines because then the regulatory safety is only concerned with the sterility of the injection device (the needle and vaccine) and the purity of what's in the vaccine itself NOT the behavior of the contents in the vaccine. He elaborates on this at the 50 min mark. So the safety studies were only concerned with established safety guidelines AROUND CONVENTIONAL VACCINES. If these were categorized as GENE THERAPY TECHNOLOGY which is what they actually are, then the safety studies would be concerned with the behavior of the technology, the mRNA lipid nanoparticles, where they travel in the body, and what consequences stem from that.
~50 min mark
51 min mark: Wolfgang Wodarg adds to this, stating that in Germany they changed the definition of vaccines in 2009 to encompass Gene Therapy Technology. He surmises in anticipation of the need for this in the future, i.e., the roll out of a Fake Pandemic in 2020.
Malone responds with:
"The consequence of this decision, is that the regulators have treated the gene therapy products as traditional vaccines and they required, if you understand pharmaceuticals, they require rigorous characterization of the quantity, purity etc. of the material in the needle, but if you think this through, the active agent is the expressed protein antigen, and normally one would characterize with for a traditional vaccine exactly how much of that expressed protein is produced, where it goes, and for how long. In these cases the regulators have not done that, so we have no indication of the levels of spike produced, the distribution of spike produced and the duration of spike produced."
Wodarg: "We don't know the target"
Malone: "Well just so, we don't know the cells that they are infecting or transfecting....What we do know is that the adenovirus vector were designed for prolonged protein expression, the mRNA logic is that it enables shorter term drug like activity and then the RNA is degraded, but we don't know what the kinetcs are (pharmacokinetics). So the regulators have, in many ways to my eyes, in looking at, for instance, the Japanese technical document (Japan's independent Pfizer BioNtech vaccine research) have been designed to give the right answer, the answer desired by the pharmaceutical companies, not the scientifically rigorous answer. The only explanation I can come up with is that the regulators didn't have sufficient background to comprehend the data they were shown and it's deficiencies. I wanted to make this key point, we do not understand how much protein is being made by any of these genetic vaccine technologies, where it's being made and for how long it's being made, and I believe that's a major oversight."
Fuellmich then states that "contrary to what these vaccine makers have told us, it doesn't stay at the injection site but moves anywhere in the body?"
Malone confirms and adds:
"In the case of Pfizer, they characterize the pharmaco-distribution, of the active drug material and the expression of the trans-gene, the encoded RNA, not using the final drug product but rather a surrogate, this is red flag number 1, that's not usually allowed, and they characterize the expression of spike in the animal models, they characterized the expression of luciferase, luciferase is the protein that makes the firefly tail glow.....so it's very sensitive reportaging because it's photons and we have photon cameras. Normally, the way the data is characterized is you dissect the animal and light the cells in each sample and then you can precisely calculate the amount of protein but we aren't even talking about spike protein but luciferase...there is a parlor trick that can be done with luciferase where you image the whole animal, you inject the luciferase and you can see the photons through the whole animal, however, you can appreciate that these photons get scattered as they are obstructed by bones and muscle tissue and you end up with a biased image that only shows the most expression. It's the least sensitive method. Based on that Pfizer asserts that the expression is localized just to the site of injection yet that's the method Pfizer used for their dossier, a highly biased assay, and this illustrates my point, I think that the regulatory authorities were not sufficiently technically expert, to comprehend, we have an expression in the states "pulling the wool over your eyes", to comprehend that Pfizer had selected the least sensitive method to characterize the distribution of a surrogate protein rather than the actual drug product."
60 min mark: "This feeds back into a point of a checklist used by regulators, with traditional vaccines genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity are not required, with a gene therapy product they absolutely are required. In this case, by Pfizer's own admission in their protocol, the reproductive toxicology studies were not done rigorously and there were no geno-toxicity studies done. So we have, to be technically accurate, we have evidence of non-good laboratory practice studies of concentration of synthetic lipids into ovarian tissue, and spleen and bone marrow and other places you might expect them to distribute to but ovarian tissue is particularly concerning..."
63 min mark, concluding remarks:
Malone: "With all of this pressure from the governments, the press and the media, we are unable to meet the fundamentals of medical ethics that go back to the Nuremburg trials and those are, there must be complete disclosure of risk, those risks must be comprehended, and there has to be free willingness to accept the product, it cannot be coerced or enticed. Those are bedrock principles and these are currently experimental products and for some reason governments around the world have decided they can jettison these fundamental ethics and hastily implement these vaccines and do it in a universal way...and there's been this push to apply the aggregated risk that is almost completely concentrated among the elderly and obese to the entire population and using this to justify vaccinating the entire population with the logic that this will enable herd immunity, but it won't enable herd immunity because the vaccines aren't sterilizing for the virus and the whole logic, when you examine the underlying logic of what is being promoted and this is what gives rise to the conspiracy theories because clearly this logic we've applied to vaccine development for decades is not being followed"
Supporting information:
Japan's Pfize BioNtech vaccine Pharmacokinetic Test (see page 7 for concentration of mRNA lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries):
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Pfizer-mRNA-goes-to-Ovaries.pdf
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/nrownd/phizer_vaccine_study_shows_mrna_lipid/
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/omrzfh/is_dr_malone_being_threatened/
See also:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.